mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Leveraging the Power of Conversations: Optimal Key Term Selection in Conversational Contextual Bandits

arXiv 2505.21393 ↗First posted 27 May 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Conversational recommender systems proactively query users with relevant "key terms" and leverage the feedback to elicit users' preferences for personalized recommendations. Conversational contextual bandits, a prevalent approach in this domain, aim to optimize preference learning by balancing exploitation and exploration. However, several limitations hinder their effectiveness in real-world scenarios. First, existing algorithms employ key term selection strategies with insufficient exploration, often failing to thoroughly probe users' preferences and resulting in suboptimal preference estimation. Second, current algorithms typically rely on deterministic rules to initiate conversations, causing unnecessary interactions when preferences are well-understood and missed opportunities when preferences are uncertain. To address these limitations, we propose three novel algorithms: CLiSK, CLiME, and CLiSK-ME. CLiSK introduces smoothed key term contexts to enhance exploration in preference learning, CLiME adaptively initiates conversations based on preference uncertainty, and CLiSK-ME integrates both techniques. We theoretically prove that all three algorithms achieve a tighter regret upper bound of O(√dTlogT) with respect to the time horizon T, improving upon existing methods. Additionally, we provide a matching lower bound Omega(√dT) for conversational bandits, demonstrating that our algorithms are nearly minimax optimal. Extensive evaluations on both synthetic and real-world datasets show that our approaches achieve at least a 14.6% improvement in cumulative regret.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2025.

Builds on

12 of 32 references.

References · 12

  1. 2021Advances and Challenges in Conversational Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 118
  2. 2018Conversational Recommender Systemcited by 115
  3. 2019Conversational Contextual Bandit: Algorithm and Applicationcited by 35
  4. 2020Seamlessly Unifying Attributes and Items: Conversational Recommendation for Cold-Start Userscited by 33
  5. 2018The Externalities of Exploration and How Data Diversity Helps Exploitationcited by 20
  6. 2022Comparison-based Conversational Recommender System with Relative Bandit Feedbackcited by 12
  7. 2023Efficient Explorative Key-term Selection Strategies for Conversational Contextual Banditscited by 12
  8. 2022Hierarchical Conversational Preference Elicitation with Bandit Feedbackcited by 10
  9. 2025A Multi-Agent Conversational Bandit Approach to Online Evaluation and Selection of User-Aligned LLM Responsescited by 8
  10. 2024FedConPE: Efficient Federated Conversational Bandits with Heterogeneous Clientscited by 6
  11. 2024Conversational Dueling Bandits in Generalized Linear Modelscited by 5
  12. 2025Demystifying Online Clustering of Bandits: Enhanced Exploration Under Stochastic and Smoothed Adversarial Contextscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.