Variational Deep Learning via Implicit Regularization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern deep learning models generalize remarkably well in-distribution, despite being overparametrized and trained with little to no explicit regularization. Instead, current theory credits implicit regularization imposed by the choice of architecture, hyperparameters, and optimization procedure. However, deep neural networks can be surprisingly non-robust, resulting in overconfident predictions and poor out-of-distribution generalization. Bayesian deep learning addresses this via model averaging, but typically requires significant computational resources as well as carefully elicited priors to avoid overriding the benefits of implicit regularization. Instead, in this work, we propose to regularize variational neural networks solely by relying on the implicit bias of (stochastic) gradient descent. We theoretically characterize this inductive bias in overparametrized linear models as generalized variational inference and demonstrate the importance of the choice of parametrization. Empirically, our approach demonstrates strong in- and out-of-distribution performance without additional hyperparameter tuning and with minimal computational overhead.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 67 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2025.
Builds on
67 of 86 references.
References · 67
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,492
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
- 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 738
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 655
- 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 560
38 more
- 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
- 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 443
- 2020Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance Awarenesscited by 389
- 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 365
- 2017Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Sizecited by 320
- 2021What Are Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors Really Like?cited by 308
- 2022Tensor Programs V: Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfercited by 288
- 2018Characterizing Implicit Bias in Terms of Optimization Geometrycited by 266
- 2018Online Structured Laplace Approximations For Overcoming Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 201
- 2013A General Framework for Updating Belief Distributionscited by 175
- 2019Practical Deep Learning with Bayesian Principlescited by 158
- 2019Tensor Programs I: Wide Feedforward or Recurrent Neural Networks of Any Architecture are Gaussian Processescited by 151
- 2020Tensor Programs II: Neural Tangent Kernel for Any Architecturecited by 143
- 2019MNIST-C: A Robustness Benchmark for Computer Visioncited by 138
- 2017A Bayesian Perspective on Generalization and Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 135
- 2017Approximating Continuous Functions by ReLU Nets of Minimal Widthcited by 122
- 2018Convergence of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 110
- 2022Plex: Towards Reliability using Pretrained Large Model Extensionscited by 102
- 2021Priors in Bayesian Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 101
- 2020Classification vs regression in overparameterized regimes: Does the loss function matter?cited by 97
- 2017Noisy Natural Gradient as Variational Inferencecited by 94
- 2019Approximate Inference Turns Deep Networks into Gaussian Processescited by 89
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning via Subnetwork Inferencecited by 87
- 2022On the Implicit Bias in Deep-Learning Algorithmscited by 86
- 2016Structured and Efficient Variational Deep Learning with Matrix Gaussian Posteriorscited by 82
- 2024Variational Bayesian Last Layerscited by 69
- 2024Variational Learning is Effective for Large Deep Networkscited by 65
- 2018Stochastic Gradient Descent on Separable Data: Exact Convergence with a Fixed Learning Ratecited by 64
- 2022Deep Ensembles Work, But Are They Necessary?cited by 63
- 2022Do Bayesian Neural Networks Need To Be Fully Stochastic?cited by 63
- 2023The No Free Lunch Theorem, Kolmogorov Complexity, and the Role of Inductive Biases in Machine Learningcited by 63
- 2024Position: Bayesian Deep Learning is Needed in the Age of Large-Scale AIcited by 62
- 2020Is SGD a Bayesian sampler? Well, almostcited by 50
- 2023A Study of Bayesian Neural Network Surrogates for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 50
- 2023Tractable Function-Space Variational Inference in Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 41
- 2020Understanding Variational Inference in Function-Spacecited by 40
- 2018SLANG: Fast Structured Covariance Approximations for Bayesian Deep Learning with Natural Gradientcited by 34
50 most cited of 67 All 67 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.