Improved Regret and Contextual Linear Extension for Pandora's Box and Prophet Inequality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the Pandora's Box problem in an online learning setting with semi-bandit feedback. In each round, the learner sequentially pays to open up to n boxes with unknown reward distributions, observes rewards upon opening, and decides when to stop. The utility of the learner is the maximum observed reward minus the cumulative cost of opened boxes, and the goal is to minimize regret defined as the gap between the cumulative expected utility and that of the optimal policy. We propose a new algorithm that achieves widetildeO(√nT) regret after T rounds, which improves the widetildeO(n√T) bound of Agarwal et al. [2024] and matches the known lower bound up to logarithmic factors. To better capture real-life applications, we then extend our results to a natural but challenging contextual linear setting, where each box's expected reward is linear in some known but time-varying d-dimensional context and the noise distribution is fixed over time. We design an algorithm that learns both the linear function and the noise distributions, achieving widetildeO(nd√T) regret. Finally, we show that our techniques also apply to the online Prophet Inequality problem, where the learner must decide immediately whether or not to accept a revealed reward. In both non-contextual and contextual settings, our approach achieves similar improvements and regret bounds.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2025.
Builds on
19 of 32 references.
References · 19
- 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 481
- 2015Cascading Bandits: Learning to Rank in the Cascade Modelcited by 77
- 2019Settling the Sample Complexity of Single-parameter Revenue Maximizationcited by 24
- 2019Generalizing Complex Hypotheses on Product Distributions: Auctions, Prophet Inequalities, and Pandora's Problemcited by 22
- 2022Bandit Algorithms for Prophet Inequality and Pandora's Boxcited by 13
- 2017The Price of Information in Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 12
- 2020Pandora's Box Problem with Order Constraintscited by 12
- 2022Online Learning for Min Sum Set Cover and Pandora's Boxcited by 11
- 2024Sample Complexity of Posted Pricing for a Single Itemcited by 11
- 2019Pandora's Box with Correlations: Learning and Approximationcited by 10
- 2020Learning Utilities and Equilibria in Non-Truthful Auctionscited by 8
- 2023Semi-Bandit Learning for Monotone Stochastic Optimizationcited by 8
7 more
- 2023Weitzman's Rule for Pandora's Box with Correlationscited by 7
- 2021Tight Guarantees for Multi-unit Prophet Inequalities and Online Stochastic Knapsackcited by 6
- 2022Pandora's Problem with Nonobligatory Inspection: Optimal Structure and a PTAScited by 6
- 2022Contextual Pandora's Boxcited by 5
- 2022Pandora Box Problem with Nonobligatory Inspection: Hardness and Approximation Schemecited by 5
- 2023Recent Developments in Pandora's Box Problem: Variants and Applicationscited by 5
- 2019Prophet inequality for bipartite matching: merits of being simple and non adaptivecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2025Online Algorithms for Repeated Optimal Stopping: Balancing Baseline Guarantees and Regretcited by 1
- 2026Learning Markov Decision Processes under Fully Bandit Feedbackcited by 1
- 2026Online Pandora's Box for Contextual LLM Cascadingcited by 1
- 2026Learning in Prophet Inequalities with Noisy Observationscited by 0
- 2026Optimal No-Regret Learning for Repeated Prophet Inequalitycited by 0
- 2026Optimal No-Regret Learning for Repeated Prophet Inequality20 Sep 2026
- 2026Online Pandora's Box for Contextual LLM Cascading5 Jun 2026
- 2026Learning in Prophet Inequalities with Noisy Observations2 Apr 2026
- 2026Learning Markov Decision Processes under Fully Bandit Feedback2 Feb 2026
- 2025Online Algorithms for Repeated Optimal Stopping: Balancing Baseline Guarantees and Regret6 Nov 2025