ALPS: Attention Localization and Pruning Strategy for Efficient Alignment of Large Language Models
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Aligning general-purpose large language models (LLMs) to downstream tasks often incurs significant training adjustment costs. Prior research has explored various avenues to enhance alignment efficiency, primarily through minimal-data training or data-driven activations to identify key attention heads. However, these approaches inherently introduce data dependency, which hinders generalization and reusability. To address this issue and enhance model alignment efficiency, we propose the Attention Localization and Pruning Strategy (ALPS), an efficient algorithm that localizes the most task-sensitive attention heads and prunes by restricting attention training updates to these heads, thereby reducing alignment costs. Experimental results demonstrate that our method activates only 10% of attention parameters during fine-tuning while achieving a 2% performance improvement over baselines on three tasks. Moreover, the identified task-specific heads are transferable across datasets and mitigate knowledge forgetting. Our work and findings provide a novel perspective on efficient LLM alignment. The code is available at https://github.com/VoiceBeer/ALPS.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 42 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2025.
Builds on
42 of 60 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Understanding Layer Significance in LLM Alignment23 Oct
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment18 May
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions20 Dec
Other references · 39
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
27 more
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,139
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,830
- 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,593
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
- 2023GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpointscited by 1,346
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
- 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,203
- 2024DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligencecited by 1,181
- 2024DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelcited by 1,135
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
- 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 856
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 839
- 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 816
- 2017Wasserstein GANcited by 639
- 2023MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuningcited by 487
- 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 422
- 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 334
- 2023Explainability for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 333
- 2024Retrieval Head Mechanistically Explains Long-Context Factualitycited by 232
- 2023Tracr: Compiled Transformers as a Laboratory for Interpretabilitycited by 104
- 2024RazorAttention: Efficient KV Cache Compression Through Retrieval Headscited by 100
- 2024Not All Heads Matter: A Head-Level KV Cache Compression Method with Integrated Retrieval and Reasoningcited by 97
- 2024What Matters in Transformers? Not All Attention is Neededcited by 84
- 2024On the Role of Attention Heads in Large Language Model Safetycited by 72
- 2023Maybe Only 0.5% Data is Needed: A Preliminary Exploration of Low Training Data Instruction Tuningcited by 58
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2022Gradient-based Intra-attention Pruning on Pre-trained Language Models
- 2025From Local to Global: Revisiting Structured Pruning Paradigms for Large Language Models
- 2025Alignment and Safety in Large Language Models: Safety Mechanisms, Training Paradigms, and Emerging Challenges
- 2024LongAlign: A Recipe for Long Context Alignment of Large Language Models
- 2026AlignTune: Modular Toolkit for Post-Training Alignment of Large Language Models
- 2025A Survey on Training-free Alignment of Large Language Models
- 2024Aligner: Efficient Alignment by Learning to Correct
- 2025Aligning Multimodal LLM with Human Preference: A Survey