mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Flex-Judge: Text-Only Reasoning Unleashes Zero-Shot Multimodal Evaluators

arXiv 2505.18601 ↗First posted 24 May 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 6

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Human-generated reward signals are critical for aligning generative models with human preferences, guiding both training and inference-time evaluations. While large language models (LLMs) employed as proxy evaluators, i.e., LLM-as-a-Judge, significantly reduce the costs associated with manual annotations, they typically require extensive modality-specific training data and fail to generalize well across diverse multimodal tasks. In this paper, we propose Flex-Judge, a reasoning-guided multimodal judge model that leverages minimal textual reasoning data to robustly generalize across multiple modalities and evaluation formats. Our core intuition is that structured textual reasoning explanations inherently encode generalizable decision-making patterns, enabling an effective transfer to multimodal judgments, e.g., with images or videos. Empirical results demonstrate that Flex-Judge, despite being trained on significantly fewer text data, achieves competitive or superior performance compared to state-of-the-art commercial APIs and extensively trained multimodal evaluators. Notably, Flex-Judge presents broad impact in modalities like molecule, where comprehensive evaluation benchmarks are scarce, underscoring its practical value in resource-constrained domains. Our framework highlights reasoning-based text supervision as a powerful, cost-effective alternative to traditional annotation-intensive approaches, substantially advancing scalable multimodal model-as-a-judge.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 84 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2025.

Builds on

84 of 98 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024LLaVA-CoT: Let Vision Language Models Reason Step-by-Step15 Nov
  2. 2024CREMA: Generalizable and Efficient Video-Language Reasoning via Multimodal Modular Fusion8 Feb

Other references · 82

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  5. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  6. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  7. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  8. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  9. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  10. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  11. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  12. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
38 more
  1. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  2. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  3. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  4. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  5. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  6. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  7. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,718
  8. 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,341
  9. 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,242
  10. 2019OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledgecited by 1,121
  11. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
  12. 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,045
  13. 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 977
  14. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
  15. 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 890
  16. 2023Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 790
  17. 2025Qwen2.5-Omni Technical Reportcited by 736
  18. 2019How multilingual is Multilingual BERT?cited by 645
  19. 2023Qwen-Audio: Advancing Universal Audio Understanding via Unified Large-Scale Audio-Language Modelscited by 608
  20. 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 575
  21. 2024Qwen2-Audio Technical Reportcited by 560
  22. 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 480
  23. 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 465
  24. 2024Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Modelscited by 446
  25. 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedbackcited by 412
  26. 2024MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmarkcited by 372
  27. 2019Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 367
  28. 2023JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judgescited by 367
  29. 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 316
  30. 2023Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Promptingcited by 307
  31. 2019Beto, Bentz, Becas: The Surprising Cross-Lingual Effectiveness of BERTcited by 301
  32. 2024LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation Taskscited by 243
  33. 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modelingcited by 239
  34. 2021NISQA: A Deep CNN-Self-Attention Model for Multidimensional Speech Quality Prediction with Crowdsourced Datasetscited by 192
  35. 2025RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoningcited by 154
  36. 2024Generative Reward Modelscited by 148
  37. 2024GenAI-Bench: Evaluating and Improving Compositional Text-to-Visual Generationcited by 135
  38. 2024LLaVA-Critic: Learning to Evaluate Multimodal Modelscited by 134

50 most cited of 82 All 82 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026DeltaRubric: Generative Multimodal Reward Modeling via Joint Planning and Verification
  2. 2025Multi-Crit: Benchmarking Multimodal Judges on Pluralistic Criteria-Following
  3. 2026Judge Model for Large-scale Multimodality Benchmarks
  4. 2025Multimodal RewardBench 2: Evaluating Omni Reward Models for Interleaved Text and Image
  5. 2024MM-InstructEval: Zero-Shot Evaluation of (Multimodal) Large Language Models on Multimodal Reasoning Tasks
  6. 2025ROVER: Benchmarking Reciprocal Cross-Modal Reasoning for Omnimodal Generation
  7. 2025ARM-Thinker: Reinforcing Multimodal Generative Reward Models with Agentic Tool Use and Visual Reasoning
  8. 2026Omni-R1: Towards the Unified Generative Paradigm for Multimodal Reasoning