mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Twin-2K-500: A dataset for building digital twins of over 2,000 people based on their answers to over 500 questions

arXiv 2505.17479 ↗First posted 23 May 2025cs.CY cs.AI cs.HCcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-based digital twin simulation, where large language models are used to emulate individual human behavior, holds great promise for research in AI, social science, and digital experimentation. However, progress in this area has been hindered by the scarcity of real, individual-level datasets that are both large and publicly available. This lack of high-quality ground truth limits both the development and validation of digital twin methodologies. To address this gap, we introduce a large-scale, public dataset designed to capture a rich and holistic view of individual human behavior. We survey a representative sample of N = 2,058 participants (average 2.42 hours per person) in the US across four waves with 500 questions in total, covering a comprehensive battery of demographic, psychological, economic, personality, and cognitive measures, as well as replications of behavioral economics experiments and a pricing survey. The final wave repeats tasks from earlier waves to establish a test-retest accuracy baseline. Initial analyses suggest the data are of high quality and show promise for constructing digital twins that predict human behavior well at the individual and aggregate levels. By making the full dataset publicly available, we aim to establish a valuable testbed for the development and benchmarking of LLM-based persona simulations. Beyond LLM applications, due to its unique breadth and scale the dataset also enables broad social science research, including studies of cross-construct correlations and heterogeneous treatment effects.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2025.

Builds on

7 of 50 references.

References · 7

  1. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  2. 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 773
  3. 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 752
  4. 2022Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studiescited by 515
  5. 2024LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individualscited by 249
  6. 2025LLM Generated Persona is a Promise with a Catchcited by 81
  7. 2023The Challenge of Using LLMs to Simulate Human Behavior: A Causal Inference Perspectivecited by 59

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 15.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025TwinVoice: A Multi-dimensional Benchmark Towards Digital Twins via LLM Persona Simulationcited by 15
  2. 2025SAGE: A Top-Down Bottom-Up Knowledge-Grounded User Simulator for Multi-turn AGent Evaluationcited by 6
  3. 2026Physics of Agents: Statistical Mechanics Predicts Collective Behavior of AI Agentscited by 6
  4. 2026When Can Digital Personas Reliably Approximate Human Survey Findings?cited by 4
  5. 2025TextBO: Bayesian Optimization in Language Space for Eval-Efficient Self-Improving AIcited by 3
  6. 2026PICon: A Multi-Turn Interrogation Framework for Evaluating Persona Agent Consistencycited by 3
  7. 2025HugAgent: A Human Simulation Benchmark for Individual-Level Reasoningcited by 2
  8. 2025The Sign Estimator: LLM Alignment in the Face of Choice Heterogeneitycited by 2
  9. 2026Persona-Based Simulation of Human Opinion at Population Scalecited by 2
  10. 2026From Demographics to Survey Anchors: Evaluating LLM Agents for Modeling Retirement Attitudescited by 2
  11. 2025Graph-Based Alternatives to LLMs for Human Simulationcited by 1
  12. 2026Large Behavior Model: A Promptable Digital Twin of the Retail Customercited by 1
10 more
  1. 2026Item-Mean Surrogates: Why Richer Persona Data Fail to Improve LLMs as Human Surrogatescited by 1
  2. 2026When Can You Trust Your Synthetic Users? Diagnostics and Corrections for LLM Consumer Panelscited by 1
  3. 2025Assessing the Human-Likeness of LLM-Driven Digital Twins in Simulating Health Care System Trustcited by 0
  4. 2026Whom to Query for What: Adaptive Group Elicitation via Multi-Turn LLM Interactionscited by 0
  5. 2026Beyond Recall: Behavioral Specification as an Interpretive Layer for AI Personalizationcited by 0
  6. 2026Posterior Twins: Distributional Behavioral Simulation for Enterprise Decisionscited by 0
  7. 2026Mind the Gaps: Mixture-of-Minds for Human Simulationcited by 0
  8. 2026Beyond Raw Transcripts: Structured Persona Extraction for LLM-Based Digital Twinscited by 0
  9. 2026Artificial Societies Benchmark: A Validation Framework for Synthetic Researchcited by 0
  10. 2026Benchmarking Psychological Dynamics in Generative Agentscited by 0