mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reconsidering Fairness Through Unawareness From the Perspective of Model Multiplicity

arXiv 2505.16638 ↗First posted 22 May 2025cs.LG cs.CY stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness through Unawareness (FtU) describes the idea that discrimination against demographic groups can be avoided by not considering group membership in the decisions or predictions. This idea has long been criticized in the machine learning literature as not being sufficient to ensure fairness. In addition, the use of additional features is typically thought to increase the accuracy of the predictions for all groups, so that FtU is sometimes thought to be detrimental to all groups. In this paper, we show both theoretically and empirically that FtU can reduce algorithmic discrimination without necessarily reducing accuracy. We connect this insight with the literature on Model Multiplicity, to which we contribute with novel theoretical and empirical results. Furthermore, we illustrate how, in a real-life application, FtU can contribute to the deployment of more equitable policies without losing efficacy. Our findings suggest that FtU is worth considering in practical applications, particularly in high-risk scenarios, and that the use of protected attributes such as gender in predictive models should be accompanied by a clear and well-founded justification.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2025.

Builds on

20 of 50 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  3. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  4. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
  5. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  6. 2019Predictive Multiplicity in Classificationcited by 162
  7. 2018The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairnesscited by 94
  8. 2021Characterizing Fairness Over the Set of Good Models Under Selective Labelscited by 65
  9. 2024Amazing Things Come From Having Many Good Modelscited by 52
  10. 2023Difficult Lessons on Social Prediction from Wisconsin Public Schoolscited by 35
  11. 2023A Path to Simpler Models Starts With Noisecited by 33
  12. 2020Algorithmic Fairness from a Non-ideal Perspectivecited by 30
8 more
  1. 2023Unprocessing Seven Years of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 18
  2. 2023The Relative Value of Prediction in Algorithmic Decision Makingcited by 14
  3. 2024From the Fair Distribution of Predictions to the Fair Distribution of Social Goods: Evaluating the Impact of Fair Machine Learning on Long-Term Unemploymentcited by 12
  4. 2024Allocation Requires Prediction Only if Inequality Is Lowcited by 8
  5. 2022The Objective Function: Science and Society in the Age of Machine Intelligencecited by 6
  6. 2024The Legal Duty to Search for Less Discriminatory Algorithmscited by 5
  7. 2024The Costs of Pretending That There Are Data-Generating Probability Distributions in the Social Worldcited by 4
  8. 2024Comparing Targeting Strategies for Maximizing Social Welfare with Limited Resourcescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.