mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Amortized Linear-time Exact Shapley Value for Product-Kernel Methods

arXiv 2505.16516 ↗First posted 22 May 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Kernel methods are widely used in machine learning and statistics for their flexibility and expressive power, yet their black-box nature limits adoption in high-stakes applications. Shapley value-based attribution methods such as SHAP, and kernel-specific adaptations including RKHS-SHAP, provide a principled framework for explainability -- but exact computation of Shapley values is generally intractable, forcing existing approaches to rely on approximations that incur unavoidable estimation error. We introduce PKeX-Shapley, an algorithm that exploits the multiplicative structure of product kernels to compute exact Shapley values for all d features in quadratic time in d. The method rests on a distribution-free removal operator intrinsic to the product-kernel structure: removing a feature replaces its kernel factor with the multiplicative identity. This yields a parameter-free value function -- requiring no sampling and no density estimation -- and uniquely determines a functional decomposition of the model. Building on this value function, we develop shared recursive formulations that evaluate all feature attributions jointly, achieving amortized linear time per feature with numerical stability. Beyond predictive modeling, the framework extends to widely used kernel-based discrepancies such as the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) and the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC), providing new tools for interpretable statistical analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2025.

Builds on

23 of 47 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  3. 2016Kernel Mean Embedding of Distributions: A Review and Beyondcited by 364
  4. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
  5. 2016A Kernelized Stein Discrepancy for Goodness-of-fit Tests and Model Evaluationcited by 236
  6. 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 200
  7. 2019Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problemcited by 167
  8. 2020Improving KernelSHAP: Practical Shapley Value Estimation via Linear Regressioncited by 154
  9. 2016A Kernel Test of Goodness of Fitcited by 143
  10. 2019The Shapley Taylor Interaction Indexcited by 143
  11. 2020True to the Model or True to the Data?cited by 126
  12. 2024shapiq: Shapley Interactions for Machine Learningcited by 43
11 more
  1. 2017Characteristic and Universal Tensor Product Kernelscited by 41
  2. 2018Product Kernel Interpolation for Scalable Gaussian Processescited by 31
  3. 2021RKHS-SHAP: Shapley Values for Kernel Methodscited by 30
  4. 2018Causal Inference via Kernel Deviance Measurescited by 22
  5. 2023Explaining the Uncertain: Stochastic Shapley Values for Gaussian Process Modelscited by 19
  6. 2024Credal Two-Sample Tests of Epistemic Uncertaintycited by 16
  7. 2023Explanations of Black-Box Models based on Directional Feature Interactionscited by 15
  8. 2024Unifying Feature-Based Explanations with Functional ANOVA and Cooperative Game Theorycited by 10
  9. 2025A Unified View of Optimal Kernel Hypothesis Testingcited by 5
  10. 2024Unifying Attribution-Based Explanations Using Functional Decompositioncited by 4
  11. 2024Fast Calculation of Feature Contributions in Boosting Treescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.