FREESON: Retriever-Free Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning via Corpus-Traversing MCTS
On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in multi-step reasoning and calling search engines at appropriate steps. However, existing retrieval-augmented reasoning approaches rely on separate retrieval models, limiting the LRM's role in retrieval to deciding when to retrieve and how to query. This separation not only increases hardware and operational costs but also leads to errors in the retrieval process due to the representation bottleneck, a phenomenon where the retriever's embedding space is not expressive enough to meet the generator's requirements. To address this, we shift our perspective from sequence-to-sequence matching to locating the answer-containing paths within the corpus, and propose a novel framework called FREESON (Retriever-FREE Retrieval-Augmented ReaSONing). This framework enables LRMs to retrieve relevant knowledge on their own by acting as both a generator and retriever. To achieve this, we introduce a variant of the MCTS algorithm specialized for the retrieval task, which we call CT-MCTS (Corpus-Traversing Monte Carlo Tree Search). In this algorithm, LRMs traverse through the corpus toward answer-containing regions. Our results on five open-domain QA benchmarks, including single-hop and multi-hop questions, show that FREESON achieves an average improvement of 14.4% in EM and F1 over four multi-step reasoning models with a separate retriever, and it also performs comparably to the strongest baseline, surpassing it by 3% on PopQA and 2WikiMultihopQA.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 0 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2025.
Builds on
0 of 57 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026NeuroSymActive: Differentiable Neural-Symbolic Reasoning with Active Exploration for Knowledge Graph Question Answeringcited by 3
- 2026Latent Abstraction for Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 1
- 2026When LLM Meets Tree Search: A Systematic View of Inference as Search in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026When LLM Meets Tree Search: A Systematic View of Inference as Search in Large Language Models31 Aug 2026
- 2026Latent Abstraction for Retrieval-Augmented Generation20 Apr 2026
- 2026NeuroSymActive: Differentiable Neural-Symbolic Reasoning with Active Exploration for Knowledge Graph Question Answering17 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026When to Retrieve During Reasoning: Adaptive Retrieval for Large Reasoning Models
- 2025MCTS-RAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Monte Carlo Tree Search
- 2025DeepRAG: Thinking to Retrieve Step by Step for Large Language Models
- 2025LIR3AG: A Lightweight Rerank Reasoning Strategy Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2026A Survey of Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Progress and Challenges
- 2025Retrieval-augmented reasoning with lean language models
- 2025Reasoning in Action: MCTS-Driven Knowledge Retrieval for Large Language Models
- 2026DOTRAG: Retrieval-Time Reasoning Along Paths