mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LOD1 3D City Model from LiDAR: The Impact of Segmentation Accuracy on Quality of Urban 3D Modeling and Morphology Extraction

arXiv 2505.14747 ↗First posted 20 May 2025eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Three-dimensional reconstruction of buildings, particularly at Level of Detail 1 (LOD1), plays a crucial role in various applications such as urban planning, urban environmental studies, and designing optimized transportation networks. This study focuses on assessing the potential of LiDAR data for accurate 3D building reconstruction at LOD1 and extracting morphological features from these models. Four deep semantic segmentation models, U-Net, Attention U-Net, U-Net3+, and DeepLabV3+, were used, applying transfer learning to extract building footprints from LiDAR data. The results showed that U-Net3+ and Attention U-Net outperformed the others, achieving IoU scores of 0.833 and 0.814, respectively. Various statistical measures, including maximum, range, mode, median, and the 90th percentile, were used to estimate building heights, resulting in the generation of 3D models at LOD1. As the main contribution of the research, the impact of segmentation accuracy on the quality of 3D building modeling and the accuracy of morphological features like building area and external wall surface area was investigated. The results showed that the accuracy of building identification (segmentation performance) significantly affects the 3D model quality and the estimation of morphological features, depending on the height calculation method. Overall, the UNet3+ method, utilizing the 90th percentile and median measures, leads to accurate height estimation of buildings and the extraction of morphological features.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.

Builds on

15 of 99 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
  3. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
  4. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,161
  5. 2015SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentationcited by 1,487
  6. 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,435
  7. 2014Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognitioncited by 720
  8. 2020UNet 3+: A Full-Scale Connected UNet for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 332
  9. 2018A Novel Focal Tversky loss function with improved Attention U-Net for lesion segmentationcited by 172
  10. 2017DiSAN: Directional Self-Attention Network for RNN/CNN-Free Language Understandingcited by 71
  11. 2022City3D: Large-Scale Building Reconstruction from Airborne LiDAR Point Cloudscited by 22
  12. 2023Elevation Estimation-Driven Building 3D Reconstruction from Single-View Remote Sensing Imagerycited by 17
3 more
  1. 2024Machine Learning Framework for High-Resolution Air Temperature Downscaling Using LiDAR-Derived Urban Morphological Featurescited by 6
  2. 2018Fusion of TanDEM-X and Cartosat-1 Elevation Data Supported by NeuralNetwork-Predicted Weight Mapscited by 3
  3. 2018Fusion of Urban TanDEM-X raw DEMs using variational modelscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.