mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Texts or Images? A Fine-grained Analysis on the Effectiveness of Input Representations and Models for Table Question Answering

arXiv 2505.14131 ↗First posted 20 May 2025cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In table question answering (TQA), tables are encoded as either texts or images. Prior work suggests that passing images of tables to multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) performs comparably to or even better than using textual input with large language models (LLMs). However, the lack of controlled setups limits fine-grained distinctions between these approaches. In this paper, we conduct the first controlled study on the effectiveness of several combinations of table representations and models from two perspectives: question complexity and table size. We build a new benchmark based on existing TQA datasets. In a systematic analysis of seven pairs of MLLMs and LLMs, we find that the best combination of table representation and model varies across setups. We propose FRES, a method selecting table representations dynamically, and observe a 10% average performance improvement compared to using both representations indiscriminately.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.

Builds on

19 of 29 references.

References · 19

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
  3. 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
  4. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 687
  5. 2021FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Datacited by 562
  6. 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 515
  7. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 434
  8. 2019TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verificationcited by 428
  9. 2023Monkey: Image Resolution and Text Label Are Important Things for Large Multi-modal Modelscited by 357
  10. 2022Dynamic Prompt Learning via Policy Gradient for Semi-structured Mathematical Reasoningcited by 350
  11. 2023Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Surveycited by 331
  12. 2020ToTTo: A Controlled Table-To-Text Generation Datasetcited by 268
7 more
  1. 2021TAPEX: Table Pre-training via Learning a Neural SQL Executorcited by 235
  2. 2021HiTab: A Hierarchical Table Dataset for Question Answering and Natural Language Generationcited by 118
  3. 2023SCITAB: A Challenging Benchmark for Compositional Reasoning and Claim Verification on Scientific Tablescited by 51
  4. 2024Tables as Texts or Images: Evaluating the Table Reasoning Ability of LLMs and MLLMscited by 40
  5. 2023TempTabQA: Temporal Question Answering for Semi-Structured Tablescited by 27
  6. 2024FREB-TQA: A Fine-Grained Robustness Evaluation Benchmark for Table Question Answeringcited by 16
  7. 2023PixT3: Pixel-based Table-To-Text Generationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024TableVQA-Bench: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark on Multiple Table Domains
  2. 2026TABVERSE: Benchmarking Cross-Format Table Understanding in LLMs and VLMs
  3. 2024Large Language Model for Table Processing: A Survey
  4. 2026Efficient Table QA via TableGrid Navigation and Progressive Inference Prompting
  5. 2025CRAFT: Training-Free Cascaded Retrieval for Tabular QA
  6. 2022End-to-End Table Question Answering via Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  7. 2025Enhancing Large Vision-Language Models with Layout Modality for Table Question Answering on Japanese Annual Securities Reports
  8. 2024Exploring the Impact of Table-to-Text Methods on Augmenting LLM-based Question Answering with Domain Hybrid Data