FedCTTA: A Collaborative Approach to Continual Test-Time Adaptation in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed clients without sharing raw data, making it ideal for privacy-sensitive applications. However, FL models often suffer performance degradation due to distribution shifts between training and deployment. Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) offers a promising solution by allowing models to adapt using only test samples. However, existing TTA methods in FL face challenges such as computational overhead, privacy risks from feature sharing, and scalability concerns due to memory constraints. To address these limitations, we propose Federated Continual Test-Time Adaptation (FedCTTA), a privacy-preserving and computationally efficient framework for federated adaptation. Unlike prior methods that rely on sharing local feature statistics, FedCTTA avoids direct feature exchange by leveraging similarity-aware aggregation based on model output distributions over randomly generated noise samples. This approach ensures adaptive knowledge sharing while preserving data privacy. Furthermore, FedCTTA minimizes the entropy at each client for continual adaptation, enhancing the model's confidence in evolving target distributions. Our method eliminates the need for server-side training during adaptation and maintains a constant memory footprint, making it scalable even as the number of clients or training rounds increases. Extensive experiments show that FedCTTA surpasses existing methods across diverse temporal and spatial heterogeneity scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.
Builds on
22 of 28 references.
References · 22
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
- 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,309
- 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,099
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
- 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 836
- 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 762
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
- 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 634
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
10 more
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
- 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
- 2018Training Deep Networks with Synthetic Data: Bridging the Reality Gap by Domain Randomizationcited by 292
- 2020Personalized Cross-Silo Federated Learning on Non-IID Datacited by 282
- 2021The Norm Must Go On: Dynamic Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Normalizationcited by 131
- 2023Similarity of Neural Network Models: A Survey of Functional and Representational Measurescited by 128
- 2023Universal Test-time Adaptation through Weight Ensembling, Diversity Weighting, and Prior Correctioncited by 65
- 2022Test-Time Robust Personalization for Federated Learningcited by 39
- 2023L-DAWA: Layer-wise Divergence Aware Weight Aggregation in Federated Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 29
- 2023Adaptive Test-Time Personalization for Federated Learningcited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.