Does Low Rank Adaptation Lead to Lower Robustness against Training-Time Attacks?
On the map: LLM safety and security → Backdoor and data poisoning attacks
Abstract (arXiv)
Low rank adaptation (LoRA) has emerged as a prominent technique for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) thanks to its superb efficiency gains over previous methods. While extensive studies have examined the performance and structural properties of LoRA, its behavior upon training-time attacks remain underexplored, posing significant security risks. In this paper, we theoretically investigate the security implications of LoRA's low-rank structure during fine-tuning, in the context of its robustness against data poisoning and backdoor attacks. We propose an analytical framework that models LoRA's training dynamics, employs the neural tangent kernel to simplify the analysis of the training process, and applies information theory to establish connections between LoRA's low rank structure and its vulnerability against training-time attacks. Our analysis indicates that LoRA exhibits better robustness to backdoor attacks than full fine-tuning, while becomes more vulnerable to untargeted data poisoning due to its over-simplified information geometry. Extensive experimental evaluations have corroborated our theoretical findings.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Backdoor and data poisoning attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 29 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.
Builds on
29 of 53 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Training10 Jan
- 2023Backdooring Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models with Virtual Prompt Injection31 Jul
Other references · 27
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,106
- 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 958
- 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
- 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 656
- 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 573
- 2023Poisoning Language Models During Instruction Tuningcited by 269
- 2019Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Images, Graphs and Text: A Reviewcited by 237
- 2023Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Methods for Pretrained Language Models: A Critical Review and Assessmentcited by 230
- 2022A Kernel-Based View of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 121
15 more
- 2023The Expressive Power of Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 102
- 2018An elementary introduction to information geometrycited by 76
- 2017On weight initialization in deep neural networkscited by 67
- 2024A Survey on LoRA of Large Language Modelscited by 67
- 2020GeoDA: a geometric framework for black-box adversarial attackscited by 66
- 2023How Deep Learning Sees the World: A Survey on Adversarial Attacks & Defensescited by 66
- 2024The Impact of Initialization on LoRA Finetuning Dynamicscited by 54
- 2019Natural Language Understanding with the Quora Question Pairs Datasetcited by 51
- 2024LoRA Training in the NTK Regime has No Spurious Local Minimacited by 48
- 2018The Adversarial Attack and Detection under the Fisher Information Metriccited by 18
- 2024LoRA Meets Dropout under a Unified Frameworkcited by 17
- 2024Recovering the Pre-Fine-Tuning Weights of Generative Modelscited by 16
- 2024DP-DyLoRA: Fine-Tuning Transformer-Based Models On-Device under Differentially Private Federated Learning using Dynamic Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 9
- 2024Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting In LoRA via Mean-Field Attention Dynamicscited by 7
- 2024Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Graphscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Virus Infection Attack on LLMs: Your Poisoning Can Spread "VIA" Synthetic Datacited by 4
- 2026High-Dimensional Theory of LoRA Fine-Tuning in a Solvable Attention Modelcited by 3
- 2026When pre-training hurts LoRA fine-tuning: a dynamical analysis via single-index modelscited by 2
- 2025Decision Potential Surface: A Theoretical and Practical Approximation of Large Language Model Decision Boundarycited by 0
- 2026High-Dimensional Theory of LoRA Fine-Tuning in a Solvable Attention Model4 Jun 2026
- 2026When pre-training hurts LoRA fine-tuning: a dynamical analysis via single-index models2 Feb 2026
- 2025Decision Potential Surface: A Theoretical and Practical Approximation of Large Language Model Decision Boundary27 Sep 2025
- 2025Virus Infection Attack on LLMs: Your Poisoning Can Spread "VIA" Synthetic Data27 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Why LoRA Fails to Forget: Regularized Low-Rank Adaptation Against Backdoors in Language Models
- 2025LoRA-Leak: Membership Inference Attacks Against LoRA Fine-tuned Language Models
- 2025Causal-Guided Detoxify Backdoor Attack of Open-Weight LoRA Models
- 2025LoX: Low-Rank Extrapolation Robustifies LLM Safety Against Fine-tuning
- 2025LoRA Is Slower Than You Think
- 2023Last One Standing: A Comparative Analysis of Security and Privacy of Soft Prompt Tuning, LoRA, and In-Context Learning
- 2026A Unified Study of LoRA Variants: Taxonomy, Review, Codebase, and Empirical Evaluation
- 2026Backdoor Purification for LoRA-Tuned LLMs via Null-Space Projection