mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Embedding principle of homogeneous neural network for classification problem

arXiv 2505.12419 ↗First posted 18 May 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we study the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) points of the associated maximum-margin problem in homogeneous neural networks, including fully-connected and convolutional neural networks. In particular, We investigates the relationship between such KKT points across networks of different widths generated. We introduce and formalize the KKT point embedding principle, establishing that KKT points of a homogeneous network's max-margin problem (PPhi) can be embedded into the KKT points of a larger network's problem (P_tildePhi) via specific linear isometric transformations. We rigorously prove this principle holds for neuron splitting in fully-connected networks and channel splitting in convolutional neural networks. Furthermore, we connect this static embedding to the dynamics of gradient flow training with smooth losses. We demonstrate that trajectories initiated from appropriately mapped points remain mapped throughout training and that the resulting ω-limit sets of directions are correspondingly mapped, thereby preserving the alignment with KKT directions dynamically when directional convergence occurs. We conduct several experiments to justify that trajectories are preserved. Our findings offer insights into the effects of network width, parameter redundancy, and the structural connections between solutions found via optimization in homogeneous networks of varying sizes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2025.

Builds on

16 of 22 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 652
  2. 2019Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 312
  3. 2018Characterizing Implicit Bias in Terms of Optimization Geometrycited by 263
  4. 2018Gradient descent aligns the layers of deep linear networkscited by 182
  5. 2020Directional convergence and alignment in deep learningcited by 174
  6. 2018Regularization Matters: Generalization and Optimization of Neural Nets v.s. their Induced Kernelcited by 131
  7. 2021Geometry of the Loss Landscape in Overparameterized Neural Networks: Symmetries and Invariancescited by 127
  8. 2018Stochastic subgradient method converges on tame functionscited by 121
  9. 2018Convergence of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 109
  10. 2019Conservative set valued fields, automatic differentiation, stochastic gradient method and deep learningcited by 72
  11. 2018Stochastic Gradient Descent on Separable Data: Exact Convergence with a Fixed Learning Ratecited by 63
  12. 2019Lexicographic and Depth-Sensitive Margins in Homogeneous and Non-Homogeneous Deep Modelscited by 53
4 more
  1. 2021Embedding Principle of Loss Landscape of Deep Neural Networkscited by 38
  2. 2023Benign Overfitting in Linear Classifiers and Leaky ReLU Networks from KKT Conditions for Margin Maximizationcited by 29
  3. 2022The Asymmetric Maximum Margin Bias of Quasi-Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 25
  4. 2024Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Two-Layer Networks: Margin Improvement and Fast Optimizationcited by 17

Built on by

Not cited yet.