Structured Relational Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Invariant representations are core to representation learning, yet a central challenge remains: uncovering invariants that are stable and transferable without suppressing task-relevant signals. This raises fundamental questions, requiring further inquiry, about the appropriate level of abstraction at which such invariants should be defined and which aspects of a system they should characterize. Interpretation of the environment relies on abstract knowledge structures to make sense of the current state, which leads to interactions, essential drivers of learning and knowledge acquisition. Interpretation operates at the level of higher-order relational knowledge; hence, we propose that invariant structures must be where knowledge resides, specifically as partitions defined by the closure of relational paths within an abstract knowledge space. These partitions serve as the core invariant representations, forming the structural substrate where knowledge is stored and learning occurs. On the other hand, inter-partition connectors enable the deployment of these knowledge partitions encoding task-relevant transitions. Thus, invariant partitions provide the foundational primitives of structured representation. We formalize the computational foundations for structured relational representations of the invariant partitions based on closed semiring, a relational algebraic structure.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2025.
Builds on
16 of 28 references.
References · 16
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
- 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,360
- 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,054
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
- 2021Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalizationcited by 766
- 2017Learning to Generalize: Meta-Learning for Domain Generalizationcited by 763
- 2013Domain Generalization via Invariant Feature Representationcited by 623
- 2018Towards a Definition of Disentangled Representationscited by 296
- 2020Invariant Risk Minimization Gamescited by 188
4 more
- 2018Structured Disentangled Representationscited by 62
- 2018Can Neural Networks Understand Logical Entailment?cited by 24
- 2023Systematic Visual Reasoning through Object-Centric Relational Abstractioncited by 20
- 2024Interacting Monoidal Structures with Applications in Computingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.