mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MPS-Prover: Advancing Stepwise Theorem Proving by Multi-Perspective Search and Data Curation

arXiv 2505.10962 ↗First posted 16 May 2025cs.AIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated Theorem Proving (ATP) in formal languages remains a formidable challenge in AI, demanding rigorous logical deduction and navigating vast search spaces. While large language models (LLMs) have shown promising performance, existing stepwise provers often suffer from biased search guidance, leading to inefficiencies and suboptimal proof strategies. This paper introduces the Multi-Perspective Search Prover (MPS-Prover), a novel stepwise ATP system designed to overcome these limitations. MPS-Prover incorporates two key innovations: a highly effective post-training data curation strategy that prunes approximately 40% of redundant training data without sacrificing performance, and a multi-perspective tree search mechanism. This search integrates a learned critic model with strategically designed heuristic rules to diversify tactic selection, prevent getting trapped in unproductive states, and enhance search robustness. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that MPS-Prover achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple challenging benchmarks, including miniF2F and ProofNet, outperforming prior 7B parameter models. Furthermore, our analyses reveal that MPS-Prover generates significantly shorter and more diverse proofs compared to existing stepwise and whole-proof methods, highlighting its efficiency and efficacy. Our work advances the capabilities of LLM-based formal reasoning and offers a robust framework and a comprehensive analysis for developing more powerful theorem provers.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2025.

Builds on

27 of 36 references.

References · 27

  1. 2023LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 427
  2. 2021MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicscited by 391
  3. 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 388
  4. 2022Draft, Sketch, and Prove: Guiding Formal Theorem Provers with Informal Proofscited by 291
  5. 2025DeepSeek-Prover-V2: Advancing Formal Mathematical Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Subgoal Decompositioncited by 287
  6. 2022HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem Provingcited by 197
  7. 2024DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Searchcited by 197
  8. 2023ProofNet: Autoformalizing and Formally Proving Undergraduate-Level Mathematicscited by 192
  9. 2025Kimina-Prover Preview: Towards Large Formal Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 180
  10. 2022Formal Mathematics Statement Curriculum Learningcited by 142
  11. 2025Goedel-Prover: A Frontier Model for Open-Source Automated Theorem Provingcited by 133
  12. 2024Lean Workbook: A large-scale Lean problem set formalized from natural language math problemscited by 122
15 more
  1. 2023Baldur: Whole-Proof Generation and Repair with Large Language Modelscited by 119
  2. 2023LEGO-Prover: Neural Theorem Proving with Growing Librariescited by 109
  3. 2025BFS-Prover: Scalable Best-First Tree Search for LLM-based Automatic Theorem Provingcited by 84
  4. 2016DeepMath - Deep Sequence Models for Premise Selectioncited by 81
  5. 2025STP: Self-play LLM Theorem Provers with Iterative Conjecturing and Provingcited by 79
  6. 2024TheoremLlama: Transforming General-Purpose LLMs into Lean4 Expertscited by 59
  7. 2017Deep Network Guided Proof Searchcited by 47
  8. 2017Premise Selection for Theorem Proving by Deep Graph Embeddingcited by 44
  9. 2024HunyuanProver: A Scalable Data Synthesis Framework and Guided Tree Search for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 33
  10. 2025Leveraging Online Olympiad-Level Math Problems for LLMs Training and Contamination-Resistant Evaluationcited by 29
  11. 2025Leanabell-Prover: Posttraining Scaling in Formal Reasoningcited by 27
  12. 2024Proving Theorems Recursivelycited by 26
  13. 2024Formal Theorem Proving by Rewarding LLMs to Decompose Proofs Hierarchicallycited by 22
  14. 2024SubgoalXL: Subgoal-based Expert Learning for Theorem Provingcited by 11
  15. 2025ProofAug: Efficient Neural Theorem Proving via Fine-grained Proof Structure Analysiscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 9; 2026: 1.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025LLM-based Automated Theorem Proving Hinges on Scalable Synthetic Data Generation
  2. 2026Direct Optimization of Generators for Search in Automated Theorem Proving
  3. 2026On Reasoning-Centric LLM-based Automated Theorem Proving
  4. 2025Theorem Prover as a Judge for Synthetic Data Generation
  5. 2025Prover Agent: An Agent-Based Framework for Formal Mathematical Proofs
  6. 2025MSC-180: A Benchmark for Automated Formal Theorem Proving from Mathematical Subject Classification
  7. 2025Hilbert: Recursively Building Formal Proofs with Informal Reasoning
  8. 2026A Learning Method for Symbolic Systems Using Large Language Models ↗