mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GNN-Suite: a Graph Neural Network Benchmarking Framework for Biomedical Informatics

arXiv 2505.10711 ↗First posted 15 May 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present GNN-Suite, a robust modular framework for constructing and benchmarking Graph Neural Network (GNN) architectures in computational biology. GNN-Suite standardises experimentation and reproducibility using the Nextflow workflow to evaluate GNN performance. We demonstrate its utility in identifying cancer-driver genes by constructing molecular networks from protein-protein interaction (PPI) data from STRING and BioGRID and annotating nodes with features from the PCAWG, PID, and COSMIC-CGC repositories. Our design enables fair comparisons among diverse GNN architectures including GAT, GAT3H, GCN, GCN2, GIN, GTN, HGCN, PHGCN, and GraphSAGE and a baseline Logistic Regression (LR) model. All GNNs were configured as standardised two-layer models and trained with uniform hyperparameters (dropout = 0.2; Adam optimiser with learning rate = 0.01; and an adjusted binary cross-entropy loss to address class imbalance) over an 80/20 train-test split for 300 epochs. Each model was evaluated over 10 independent runs with different random seeds to yield statistically robust performance metrics, with balanced accuracy (BACC) as the primary measure. Notably, GCN2 achieved the highest BACC (0.807 +/- 0.035) on a STRING-based network, although all GNN types outperformed the LR baseline, highlighting the advantage of network-based learning over feature-only approaches. Our results show that a common framework for implementing and evaluating GNN architectures aids in identifying not only the best model but also the most effective means of incorporating complementary data. By making GNN-Suite publicly available, we aim to foster reproducible research and promote improved benchmarking standards in computational biology. Future work will explore additional omics datasets and further refine network architectures to enhance predictive accuracy and interpretability in biomedical applications.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2025.

Builds on

18 of 59 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  2. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  3. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
  4. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
  5. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
  6. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
  7. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,576
  8. 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,167
  9. 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,048
  10. 2021QA-GNN: Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Question Answeringcited by 388
  11. 2020Point-GNN: Graph Neural Network for 3D Object Detection in a Point Cloudcited by 335
  12. 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 322
6 more
  1. 2017PMLB: A Large Benchmark Suite for Machine Learning Evaluation and Comparisoncited by 140
  2. 2021Scientific Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 60
  3. 2022Message passing all the way upcited by 47
  4. 2021A Survey on Graph-Based Deep Learning for Computational Histopathologycited by 41
  5. 2023GNNFlow: A Distributed Framework for Continuous Temporal GNN Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 5
  6. 2024GNNBENCH: Fair and Productive Benchmarking for Single-GPU GNN Systemcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.