Pure Component Property Estimation Framework Using Explainable Machine Learning Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate prediction of pure component physiochemical properties is crucial for process integration, multiscale modeling, and optimization. In this work, an enhanced framework for pure component property prediction by using explainable machine learning methods is proposed. In this framework, the molecular representation method based on the connectivity matrix effectively considers atomic bonding relationships to automatically generate features. The supervised machine learning model random forest is applied for feature ranking and pooling. The adjusted R2 is introduced to penalize the inclusion of additional features, providing an assessment of the true contribution of features. The prediction results for normal boiling point (Tb), liquid molar volume, critical temperature (Tc) and critical pressure (Pc) obtained using Artificial Neural Network and Gaussian Process Regression models confirm the accuracy of the molecular representation method. Comparison with GC based models shows that the root-mean-square error on the test set can be reduced by up to 83.8%. To enhance the interpretability of the model, a feature analysis method based on Shapley values is employed to determine the contribution of each feature to the property predictions. The results indicate that using the feature pooling method reduces the number of features from 13316 to 100 without compromising model accuracy. The feature analysis results for Tb, Tc, and Pc confirms that different molecular properties are influenced by different structural features, aligning with mechanistic interpretations. In conclusion, the proposed framework is demonstrated to be feasible and provides a solid foundation for mixture component reconstruction and process integration modelling.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2025.
Builds on
5 of 56 references.
References · 5
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
- 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 636
- 2017A Tutorial on Kernel Density Estimation and Recent Advancescited by 101
- 2022The Shapley Value in Machine Learningcited by 98
- 2025CAMs as Shapley Value-based Explainerscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.