LibVulnWatch: A Deep Assessment Agent System and Leaderboard for Uncovering Hidden Vulnerabilities in Open-Source AI Libraries
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Open-source AI libraries are foundational to modern AI systems, yet they present significant, underexamined risks spanning security, licensing, maintenance, supply chain integrity, and regulatory compliance. We introduce LibVulnWatch, a system that leverages recent advances in large language models and agentic workflows to perform deep, evidence-based evaluations of these libraries. Built on a graph-based orchestration of specialized agents, the framework extracts, verifies, and quantifies risk using information from repositories, documentation, and vulnerability databases. LibVulnWatch produces reproducible, governance-aligned scores across five critical domains, publishing results to a public leaderboard for ongoing ecosystem monitoring. Applied to 20 widely used libraries, including ML frameworks, LLM inference engines, and agent orchestration tools, our approach covers up to 88% of OpenSSF Scorecard checks while surfacing up to 19 additional risks per library, such as critical RCE vulnerabilities, missing SBOMs, and regulatory gaps. By integrating advanced language technologies with the practical demands of software risk assessment, this work demonstrates a scalable, transparent mechanism for continuous supply chain evaluation and informed library selection.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2025.
Builds on
14 of 42 references.
References · 14
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,141
- 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 384
- 2020Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Databasecited by 96
- 2020Backstabber's Knife Collection: A Review of Open Source Software Supply Chain Attackscited by 61
- 2022Taxonomy of Attacks on Open-Source Software Supply Chainscited by 58
- 2018FIRST: A Framework for Optimizing Information Quality in Mobile Crowdsensing Systemscited by 50
- 2024Open Problems in Technical AI Governancecited by 49
- 2024Large Language Model for Vulnerability Detection and Repair: Literature Review and the Road Aheadcited by 42
- 2022Toward Understanding Deep Learning Framework Bugscited by 26
- 2025Demystifying LLM Supply Chain Vulnerabilities in the Wild: Distribution, Root Cause, and Real-World Impactcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025OpenAgentSafety: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Real-World AI Agent Safety
- 2026AgentRiskBOM: A Risk-Scoping Security Bill of Materials for Agentic AI Systems
- 2025SecureVibeBench: Benchmarking Secure Vibe Coding of AI Agents via Reconstructing Vulnerability-Introducing Scenarios
- 2026Taxonomy-Driven Analysis of Open-Source AI Risk Mitigation Tools
- 2026MOSAIC-Bench: Measuring Compositional Vulnerability Induction in Coding Agents
- 2026AgenticSCR: An Autonomous Agentic Secure Code Review for Immature Vulnerabilities Detection
- 2026Open, Reliable, and Collective: A Community-Driven Framework for Tool-Using AI Agents
- 2026AgentCollabBench: Diagnosing When Good Agents Make Bad Collaborators