PCS-UQ: Uncertainty Quantification via the Predictability-Computability-Stability Framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As machine learning (ML) enters high-stakes domains, trustworthy uncertainty quantification (UQ) is essential for safety. In this paper we introduce PCS-UQ, a framework based on the Predictability, Computability, and Stability (PCS) principles for veridical data science. Starting with a candidate set of models or algorithms, PCS-UQ integrates a rigorous prediction-check to screen out unsuitable models in the set and utilizes bootstrap samples in order to capture both inter-sample variability and algorithmic instability for the prediction-checked algorithms. We then introduce a novel multiplicative calibration scheme to enhance local adaptivity, which can be viewed as a new score in conformal prediction. Moreover, we produce a compilation of 17 real-world regression datasets with manually constructed subgroups. On this benchmark, PCS-UQ maintains the target coverage while outperforming or matching conformal methods equipped with oracle-selected algorithms in interval width. PCS-UQ achieves consistent subgroup coverage, outperforming these oracle-selected conformal methods. Notably, PCS-UQ stands out in achieving both competitive interval widths and consistent subgroup coverage. Across 6 classification datasets, PCS-UQ reduces prediction set sizes by 20%. To scale the framework for deep learning, we propose computationally efficient variants that bypass expensive retraining. On three computer vision benchmarks, these variants reduce prediction set sizes by 20% over conformal baselines. Finally, we provide a theoretical proof that a modified PCS-UQ algorithm preserves valid coverage under exchangeability as a form of split conformal inference.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2025.
Builds on
25 of 85 references.
References · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 792
- 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 668
- 2019Conformal Prediction Under Covariate Shiftcited by 519
- 2020Classification with Valid and Adaptive Coveragecited by 396
- 2020Uncertainty Sets for Image Classifiers using Conformal Predictioncited by 366
- 2020Conformal Inference of Counterfactuals and Individual Treatment Effectscited by 151
- 2013Stabilitycited by 120
- 2024Large language model validity via enhanced conformal prediction methodscited by 92
13 more
- 2013Exact post-selection inference, with application to the lassocited by 91
- 2013Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing for High-Dimensional Regressioncited by 79
- 2014Optimal Inference After Model Selectioncited by 67
- 2019Veridical Data Sciencecited by 66
- 2019OpenML-Python: an extensible Python API for OpenMLcited by 63
- 2020Predictive Inference Is Free with the Jackknife+-after-Bootstrapcited by 55
- 2014Exact Post-Selection Inference for Sequential Regression Procedurescited by 48
- 2013Confidence Intervals for Random Forests: The Jackknife and the Infinitesimal Jackknifecited by 44
- 2017Iterative Random Forests to detect predictive and stable high-order interactionscited by 42
- 2024Merging uncertainty sets via majority votecited by 30
- 2019Conformal prediction with localizationcited by 23
- 2020Stable discovery of interpretable subgroups via calibration in causal studiescited by 18
- 2024KnowGraph: Knowledge-Enabled Anomaly Detection via Logical Reasoning on Graph Datacited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 3.
9 papers.
- 2025CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Riskcited by 6
- 2025PCS Workflow for Veridical Data Science in the Age of AIcited by 4
- 2026Conformal Prediction Assessment: A Framework for Conditional Coverage Evaluation and Selectioncited by 2
- 2025Cross-World Assumption and Refining Prediction Intervals for Individual Treatment Effectscited by 1
- 2025Testing for LLM response differences: the case of a composite null consisting of semantically irrelevant query perturbationscited by 1
- 2026Retrospective Counterfactual Prediction by Conditioning on the Factual Outcome: A Cross-World Approachcited by 1
- 2026Conformalized Percentile Interval: Finite Sample Validity and Improved Conditional Performancecited by 1
- 2025Rescuing double robustness: safe estimation under complete misspecificationcited by 0
- 2025VDSAgents: A PCS-Guided Multi-Agent System for Veridical Data Science Automationcited by 0
- 2026Conformalized Percentile Interval: Finite Sample Validity and Improved Conditional Performance4 May 2026
- 2026Retrospective Counterfactual Prediction by Conditioning on the Factual Outcome: A Cross-World Approach28 Mar 2026
- 2026Conformal Prediction Assessment: A Framework for Conditional Coverage Evaluation and Selection28 Mar 2026
- 2025VDSAgents: A PCS-Guided Multi-Agent System for Veridical Data Science Automation28 Oct 2025
- 2025Rescuing double robustness: safe estimation under complete misspecification26 Sep 2025
- 2025Testing for LLM response differences: the case of a composite null consisting of semantically irrelevant query perturbations13 Sep 2025
- 2025Cross-World Assumption and Refining Prediction Intervals for Individual Treatment Effects16 Jul 2025
- 2025CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk10 Jul 2025
- 2025PCS Workflow for Veridical Data Science in the Age of AI18 Jun 2025