Fusing Bidirectional Chains of Thought and Reward Mechanisms A Method for Enhancing Question-Answering Capabilities of Large Language Models for Chinese Intangible Cultural Heritage
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has provided significant support and opportunities for the advancement of domain-specific LLMs. However, fine-tuning these large models using Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) data inevitably faces challenges such as bias, incorrect knowledge inheritance, and catastrophic forgetting. To address these issues, we propose a novel training method that integrates a bidirectional chains of thought and a reward mechanism. This method is built upon ICH-Qwen, a large language model specifically designed for the field of intangible cultural heritage. The proposed method enables the model to not only perform forward reasoning but also enhances the accuracy of the generated answers by utilizing reverse questioning and reverse reasoning to activate the model's latent knowledge. Additionally, a reward mechanism is introduced during training to optimize the decision-making process. This mechanism improves the quality of the model's outputs through structural and content evaluations with different weighting schemes. We conduct comparative experiments on ICH-Qwen, with results demonstrating that our method outperforms 0-shot, step-by-step reasoning, knowledge distillation, and question augmentation methods in terms of accuracy, Bleu-4, and Rouge-L scores on the question-answering task. Furthermore, the paper highlights the effectiveness of combining the bidirectional chains of thought and reward mechanism through ablation experiments. In addition, a series of generalizability experiments are conducted, with results showing that the proposed method yields improvements on various domain-specific datasets and advanced models in areas such as Finance, Wikidata, and StrategyQA. This demonstrates that the method is adaptable to multiple domains and provides a valuable approach for model training in future applications across diverse fields.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 5 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2025.
Builds on
5 of 6 references.
References · 5
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 415
- 2024LawGPT: A Chinese Legal Knowledge-Enhanced Large Language Modelcited by 34
- 2024Reverse Thinking Makes LLMs Stronger Reasonerscited by 29
- 2025Retrieval-Augmented Process Reward Model for Generalizable Mathematical Reasoningcited by 23
- 2024Reversal of Thought: Enhancing Large Language Models with Preference-Guided Reverse Reasoning Warm-upcited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025ICH-Qwen: A Large Language Model Towards Chinese Intangible Cultural Heritage
- 2025TCC-Bench: Benchmarking the Traditional Chinese Culture Understanding Capabilities of MLLMs
- 2026CulMind: Benchmarking Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning in Chinese Cultural Heritage
- 2026ChinaHeritaQA: A Culturally-Grounded Visual Question Answering Dataset for World Heritage Sites in China
- 2026No Shortcuts to Culture: Indonesian Multi-hop Question Answering for Complex Cultural Understanding
- 2026VIRAASAT: Traversing Novel Paths for Indian Cultural Reasoning
- 2025BrowseComp-ZH: Benchmarking Web Browsing Ability of Large Language Models in Chinese
- 2025SCoRE: Benchmarking Long-Chain Reasoning in Commonsense Scenarios