Can Prompting LLMs Unlock Hate Speech Detection across Languages? A Zero-shot and Few-shot Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite growing interest in automated hate speech detection, most existing approaches overlook the linguistic diversity of online content. Multilingual instruction-tuned large language models such as LLaMA, Aya, Qwen, and BloomZ offer promising capabilities across languages, but their effectiveness in identifying hate speech through zero-shot and few-shot prompting remains underexplored. This work evaluates LLM prompting-based detection across eight non-English languages, utilizing several prompting techniques and comparing them to fine-tuned encoder models. We show that while zero-shot and few-shot prompting lag behind fine-tuned encoder models on most of the real-world evaluation sets, they achieve better generalization on functional tests for hate speech detection. Our study also reveals that prompt design plays a critical role, with each language often requiring customized prompting techniques to maximize performance.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2025.
Builds on
20 of 48 references.
References · 20
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
- 2024Aya Model: An Instruction Finetuned Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 292
- 2020HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Modelscited by 215
- 2023Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speechcited by 165
- 2019Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysiscited by 133
- 2021XLM-T: Multilingual Language Models in Twitter for Sentiment Analysis and Beyondcited by 114
- 2024Multilingual Instruction Tuning With Just a Pinch of Multilingualitycited by 71
- 2023Probing LLMs for hate speech detection: strengths and vulnerabilitiescited by 52
- 2022Multilingual HateCheck: Functional Tests for Multilingual Hate Speech Detection Modelscited by 51
- 2023"HOT" ChatGPT: The promise of ChatGPT in detecting and discriminating hateful, offensive, and toxic comments on social mediacited by 45
8 more
- 2022Large-Scale Hate Speech Detection with Cross-Domain Transfercited by 39
- 2023When does In-context Learning Fall Short and Why? A Study on Specification-Heavy Taskscited by 37
- 2024Hate Personified: Investigating the role of LLMs in content moderationcited by 23
- 2024Teuken-7B-Base & Teuken-7B-Instruct: Towards European LLMscited by 20
- 2024Better to Ask in English: Evaluation of Large Language Models on English, Low-resource and Cross-Lingual Settingscited by 14
- 2024Improving Adversarial Data Collection by Supporting Annotators: Lessons from GAHD, a German Hate Speech Datasetcited by 13
- 2024Guardians of Discourse: Evaluating LLMs on Multilingual Offensive Language Detectioncited by 5
- 2025Evaluation of Hate Speech Detection Using Large Language Models and Geographical Contextualizationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.
7 papers.
- 2025MMBERT: Scaled Mixture-of-Experts Multimodal BERT for Robust Chinese Hate Speech Detection under Cloaking Perturbationscited by 2
- 2025On the Sensitivity of Instruction-tuned LLMs to Harmful Sentences in Long Inputscited by 0
- 2026HateXScore: A Metric Suite for Evaluating Reasoning Quality in Hate Speech Explanationscited by 0
- 2026You Frame It: How Conceptual Representations Shape LLM Detection and Reasoning about Antisemitismcited by 0
- 2026Introducing the Privacy-HSD Trade-off: Hate Speech Detection, but not at the Cost of Privacycited by 0
- 2026'Ghaib in Translation' aka Unseen Harm: Measuring Cross-Script Safety Inconsistency with 'Missed-in-Urdu' Scores in LLM Hate Speech Detectioncited by 0
- 2026From Specialization to Generalization: Instruction-tuned LLMs for Robust Harmful Content Mitigationcited by 0
- 2026From Specialization to Generalization: Instruction-tuned LLMs for Robust Harmful Content Mitigation26 Aug 2026
- 2026'Ghaib in Translation' aka Unseen Harm: Measuring Cross-Script Safety Inconsistency with 'Missed-in-Urdu' Scores in LLM Hate Speech Detection25 Aug 2026
- 2026Introducing the Privacy-HSD Trade-off: Hate Speech Detection, but not at the Cost of Privacy19 Aug 2026
- 2026You Frame It: How Conceptual Representations Shape LLM Detection and Reasoning about Antisemitism6 Jul 2026
- 2026HateXScore: A Metric Suite for Evaluating Reasoning Quality in Hate Speech Explanations20 Jan 2026
- 2025On the Sensitivity of Instruction-tuned LLMs to Harmful Sentences in Long Inputs7 Oct 2025
- 2025MMBERT: Scaled Mixture-of-Experts Multimodal BERT for Robust Chinese Hate Speech Detection under Cloaking Perturbations1 Aug 2025