mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Quiet Feature Learning in Algorithmic Tasks

arXiv 2505.03997 ↗First posted 6 May 2025cs.LG cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We train Transformer-based language models on ten foundational algorithmic tasks and observe pronounced phase transitions in their loss curves that deviate from established power-law scaling trends. Over large ranges of compute, the validation loss barely improves, then abruptly decreases. Probing the models' internal representations reveals that quiet features are learned prior to any decrease in task loss. These quiet features represent intermediate algorithmic computations that do not by themselves improve the output loss. Ablation experiments demonstrate that individual quiet features are causally necessary for task performance. Our results demonstrate that substantial representational progress can remain hidden beneath an apparently flat loss curve, challenging the prevailing use of cross-entropy as a proxy for learning and motivating richer diagnostics for monitoring model training.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2025.

Builds on

29 of 36 references.

References · 29

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  4. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  5. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
  6. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  7. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
  8. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
  9. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
  10. 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 964
  11. 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
  12. 2022What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classescited by 715
17 more
  1. 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
  2. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
  3. 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 523
  4. 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 522
  5. 2023LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formcited by 267
  6. 2022Predictability and Surprise in Large Generative Modelscited by 210
  7. 2023How does GPT-2 compute greater-than?: Interpreting mathematical abilities in a pre-trained language modelcited by 202
  8. 2022Hidden Progress in Deep Learning: SGD Learns Parities Near the Computational Limitcited by 187
  9. 2023The Quantization Model of Neural Scalingcited by 138
  10. 2024Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Language Model Performancecited by 130
  11. 2023Teaching Arithmetic to Small Transformerscited by 123
  12. 2024The Evolution of Statistical Induction Heads: In-Context Learning Markov Chainscited by 118
  13. 2023Explaining grokking through circuit efficiencycited by 111
  14. 2024Physics of Language Models: Part 2.1, Grade-School Math and the Hidden Reasoning Processcited by 108
  15. 2021Learning Curve Theorycited by 85
  16. 2024Emergence in non-neural models: grokking modular arithmetic via average gradient outer productcited by 28
  17. 2022Better Hit the Nail on the Head than Beat around the Bush: Removing Protected Attributes with a Single Projectioncited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.