Bayesian full waveform inversion with sequential surrogate model refinement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bayesian formulations of inverse problems are attractive for their ability to incorporate prior knowledge and update probabilistic models as new data become available. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods sample posterior probability density functions (pdfs) but require accurate prior models and many likelihood evaluations. Dimensionality-reduction methods, such as principal component analysis (PCA), can help define the prior and train surrogate models that efficiently approximate costly forward solvers. However, for problems like full waveform inversion, the complex input/output relations often cannot be captured well by surrogate models trained only on prior samples, leading to biased results. Including samples from high-posterior-probability regions can improve accuracy, but these regions are hard to identify in advance. We propose an iterative method that progressively refines the surrogate model. Starting with low-frequency data, we train an initial surrogate and perform an MCMC inversion. The resulting posterior samples are then used to retrain the surrogate, allowing us to expand the frequency bandwidth in the next inversion step. Repeating this process reduces model errors and improves the surrogate's accuracy over the relevant input domain. Ultimately, we obtain a highly accurate surrogate across the full bandwidth, enabling a final MCMC inversion. Numerical results from 2D synthetic crosshole Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) examples show that our method outperforms ray-based approaches and those relying solely on prior sampling. The overall computational cost is reduced by about two orders of magnitude compared to full finite-difference time-domain modeling.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2025.
Builds on
10 of 75 references.
References · 10
- 2018Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimizationcited by 142
- 2019Deep-learning inversion: a next generation seismic velocity-model building methodcited by 50
- 2020Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansions: Literature Survey and Benchmarkcited by 44
- 2022Implicit Full Waveform Inversion with Deep Neural Representationcited by 26
- 2014Data-Driven Model Reduction for the Bayesian Solution of Inverse Problemscited by 20
- 2020Automatic selection of basis-adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansions for engineering applicationscited by 11
- 2023Emulating the dynamics of complex systems using autoregressive models on manifolds (mNARX)cited by 5
- 2019Efficient Polynomial Chaos Expansion for Uncertainty Quantification in Power Systemscited by 3
- 2021A new framework for experimental design using Bayesian Evidential Learning: the case of wellhead protection areacited by 3
- 2023Bayesian tomography using polynomial chaos expansion and deep generative networkscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.