Resolving Memorization in Empirical Diffusion Model for Manifold Data in High-Dimensional Spaces
On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion foundations and sampling
Abstract (arXiv)
Diffusion models are popular tools for generating new data samples, using a forward process that adds noise to data and a reverse process to denoise and produce samples. However, when the data distribution consists of n points, empirical diffusion models tend to reproduce existing data points, a phenomenon known as the memorization effect. Current literature often addresses this with complex machine learning techniques. This work shows that the memorization issue can be solved simply by applying an inertia update at the end of the empirical diffusion simulation. Our inertial diffusion model requires only the empirical score function and no additional training. We demonstrate that the distribution of samples from this model approximates the true data distribution on a C2 manifold of dimension d, within a Wasserstein-1 distance of order O(n^-frac2d+4). This bound significantly shrinks the Wasserstein distance between the population and empirical distributions, confirming that the inertial diffusion model produces new and diverse samples. Remarkably, this estimate is independent of the ambient space dimension, as no further training is needed. Our analysis shows that the inertial diffusion samples resemble Gaussian kernel density estimations on the manifold, revealing a novel connection between diffusion models and manifold learning.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 18 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2025.
Builds on
18 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 14
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Memorization and Regularization in Generative Diffusion Models27 Jan
- 2024Convergence of Diffusion Models Under the Manifold Hypothesis in High-Dimensions27 Sep
- 2024Wasserstein proximal operators describe score-based generative models and resolve memorization9 Feb
- 2024A Good Score Does not Lead to A Good Generative Model10 Jan
- 2023Closed-Form Diffusion Models19 Oct
- 2023The Emergence of Reproducibility and Generalizability in Diffusion Models8 Oct
- 2023Diffusion Models are Minimax Optimal Distribution Estimators3 Mar
- 2023Mathematical analysis of singularities in the diffusion model under the submanifold assumption19 Jan
- 2022Sampling is as easy as learning the score: theory for diffusion models with minimal data assumptions22 Sep
- 2022Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors17 Jun
- 2022Score-Based Generative Models Detect Manifolds2 Jun
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis11 May
2 more
Other references · 4
- 2024An analytic theory of creativity in convolutional diffusion modelscited by 103
- 2024A Geometric Framework for Understanding Memorization in Generative Modelscited by 40
- 2020Minimax adaptive estimation in manifold inferencecited by 3
- 2024Permutation Recovery on Manifold Data via Spectral Seriationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.
8 papers.
- 2025When Scores Learn Geometry: Rate Separations under the Manifold Hypothesiscited by 13
- 2025Generalization of Diffusion Models Arises with a Balanced Representation Spacecited by 10
- 2025A PDE Perspective on Generative Diffusion Modelscited by 2
- 2025On The Hidden Biases of Flow Matching Samplerscited by 2
- 2026Understanding diffusion models requires rethinking (again) generalizationcited by 2
- 2026Intrinsic Wasserstein Rates for Score-Based Generative Models on Smooth Manifoldscited by 1
- 2026A Quantitative Approximation Framework for Flow Distillation in Diffusion Modelscited by 0
- 2026Optimal score function estimation via derivatives constraintscited by 0
- 2026Optimal score function estimation via derivatives constraints17 Jun 2026
- 2026A Quantitative Approximation Framework for Flow Distillation in Diffusion Models2 Jun 2026
- 2026Intrinsic Wasserstein Rates for Score-Based Generative Models on Smooth Manifolds15 May 2026
- 2026Understanding diffusion models requires rethinking (again) generalization7 May 2026
- 2025Generalization of Diffusion Models Arises with a Balanced Representation Space24 Dec 2025
- 2025On The Hidden Biases of Flow Matching Samplers18 Dec 2025
- 2025A PDE Perspective on Generative Diffusion Models8 Nov 2025
- 2025When Scores Learn Geometry: Rate Separations under the Manifold Hypothesis29 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Manifold Generalization Provably Proceeds Memorization in Diffusion Models
- 2026Local Coverage Governs Memorization in Diffusion Models
- 2023On Memorization in Diffusion Models
- 2026Diffusion Model's Generalization Can Be Characterized by Inductive Biases toward a Data-Dependent Ridge Manifold
- 2026First Learn, Then Memorize: The Spectral Bias of Diffusion Models
- 2026Diffusion Model for Manifold Data: Score Decomposition, Curvature, and Statistical Complexity
- 2026Localizing Memorized Regions in Diffusion Models via Coordinate-Wise Curvature Differences
- 2025Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry Adaptive