Benchmarking Transferability: A Framework for Fair and Robust Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transferability scores aim to quantify how well a model trained on one domain generalizes to a target domain. Despite numerous methods proposed for measuring transferability, their reliability and practical usefulness remain inconclusive, often due to differing experimental setups, datasets, and assumptions. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive benchmarking framework designed to systematically evaluate transferability scores across diverse settings. Through extensive experiments, we observe variations in how different metrics perform under various scenarios, suggesting that current evaluation practices may not fully capture each method's strengths and limitations. Our findings underscore the value of standardized assessment protocols, paving the way for more reliable transferability measures and better-informed model selection in cross-domain applications. Additionally, we achieved a 3.5% improvement using our proposed metric for the head-training fine-tuning experimental setup. Our code is available in this repository: https://github.com/alizkzm/pertrobustplatform.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2025.
Builds on
32 of 41 references.
References · 32
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
- 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
- 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,838
20 more
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
- 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,020
- 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 937
- 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 843
- 2020Prototypical Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Representationscited by 636
- 2020LEEP: A New Measure to Evaluate Transferability of Learned Representationscited by 182
- 2021LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer Learningcited by 168
- 2019Transferability and Hardness of Supervised Classification Taskscited by 125
- 2019Representation Similarity Analysis for Efficient Task taxonomy & Transfer Learningcited by 86
- 2020Ranking Neural Checkpointscited by 50
- 2022Predicting Out-of-Distribution Error with the Projection Normcited by 50
- 2014A Weighted Correlation Index for Rankings with Tiescited by 41
- 2023Does progress on ImageNet transfer to real-world datasets?cited by 35
- 2022PACTran: PAC-Bayesian Metrics for Estimating the Transferability of Pretrained Models to Classification Taskscited by 30
- 2022Not All Models Are Equal: Predicting Model Transferability in a Self-challenging Fisher Spacecited by 30
- 2020Duality Diagram Similarity: a generic framework for initialization selection in task transfer learningcited by 23
- 2023ETran: Energy-Based Transferability Estimationcited by 18
- 2022Transferability-Guided Cross-Domain Cross-Task Transfer Learningcited by 13
- 2021Transferability Estimation for Semantic Segmentation Taskcited by 3
- 2024Transferable and Principled Efficiency for Open-Vocabulary Segmentationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.