Approximating neutron-star radii using gravitational-wave only measurements with symbolic regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gravitational waves emitted by binary neutron-star inspirals carry information on components' masses and tidal deformabilities, but not directly radii, which are measured by electromagnetic observations of neutron stars. To improve the multi-messenger astronomy studies of neutron stars, an expression for neutron-star radii as a function of gravitational-wave only data would be advantageous, as it would allow to compare information from two different channels. In order to do so, a symbolic regression method, pySR, is trained on TOV solutions to piecewise polytropic EOS input to discover an approximate symbolic expression for the neutron-star radius as a function of gravitational-wave measurements only. The approximation is tested on piecewise polytropic EOS NS data, as well as on NS sequences based on selected realistic (non-polytropic) dense-matter theory EOSs, achieving consistent agreement between the ground truth values and the symbolic approximation for a broad range of NS parameters covering current astrophysical observations, with average radii differences of few hundred meters. Additionally, the approximation is applied to the GW170817 gravitational-wave mass and tidal deformability posteriors, and compared to reported inferred radius distributions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2025.
Builds on
4 of 59 references.
References · 4
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2021Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Meta-Survey of Current Challenges and Future Opportunitiescited by 125
- 2023Deep symbolic regression for physics guided by units constraints: toward the automated discovery of physical lawscited by 55
- 2022Automated discovery of interpretable gravitational-wave population modelscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.