mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DiCE-Extended: A Robust Approach to Counterfactual Explanations in Machine Learning

arXiv 2504.19027 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2025cs.AI cs.LG cs.NEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has become increasingly important in decision-critical domains such as healthcare, finance, and law. Counterfactual (CF) explanations, a key approach in XAI, provide users with actionable insights by suggesting minimal modifications to input features that lead to different model outcomes. Despite significant advancements, existing CF generation methods often struggle to balance proximity, diversity, and robustness, limiting their real-world applicability. A widely adopted framework, Diverse Counterfactual Explanations (DiCE), emphasizes diversity but lacks robustness, making CF explanations sensitive to perturbations and domain constraints. To address these challenges, we introduce DiCE-Extended, an enhanced CF explanation framework that integrates multi-objective optimization techniques to improve robustness while maintaining interpretability. Our approach introduces a novel robustness metric based on the Dice-Sorensen coefficient, enabling stability under small input variations. Additionally, we refine CF generation using weighted loss components (lambdap, lambdad, lambdar) to balance proximity, diversity, and robustness. We empirically validate DiCE-Extended on benchmark datasets (COMPAS, Lending Club, German Credit, Adult Income) across multiple ML backends (Scikit-learn, PyTorch, TensorFlow). Results demonstrate improved CF validity, stability, and alignment with decision boundaries compared to standard DiCE-generated explanations. Our findings highlight the potential of DiCE-Extended in generating more reliable and interpretable CFs for high-stakes applications. Future work could explore adaptive optimization techniques and domain-specific constraints to further enhance CF generation in real-world scenarios

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2025.

Builds on

17 of 45 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  2. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
  3. 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 216
  4. 2020Multi-Objective Counterfactual Explanationscited by 157
  5. 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
  6. 2021CF-GNNExplainer: Counterfactual Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 119
  7. 2022Post-Hoc Explanations Fail to Achieve their Purpose in Adversarial Contextscited by 53
  8. 2018Interpretable Credit Application Predictions With Counterfactual Explanationscited by 43
  9. 2020ViCE: Visual Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning Modelscited by 34
  10. 2022On the Robustness of Sparse Counterfactual Explanations to Adverse Perturbationscited by 32
  11. 2021ReLAX: Reinforcement Learning Agent eXplainer for Arbitrary Predictive Modelscited by 25
  12. 2022RoCourseNet: Distributionally Robust Training of a Prediction Aware Recourse Modelcited by 11
5 more
  1. 2023Achieving Diversity in Counterfactual Explanations: a Review and Discussioncited by 11
  2. 2024The Fragility of Fairness: Causal Sensitivity Analysis for Fair Machine Learningcited by 8
  3. 2024Transforming In-Vehicle Network Intrusion Detection: VAE-based Knowledge Distillation Meets Explainable AIcited by 4
  4. 2024Generally-Occurring Model Change for Robust Counterfactual Explanationscited by 2
  5. 2025LENS-XAI: Redefining Lightweight and Explainable Network Security through Knowledge Distillation and Variational Autoencoders for Scalable Intrusion Detection in Cybersecuritycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.