An Expectation-Maximization Perspective on Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning has emerged as a powerful approach for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models, as demonstrated by systems such as OpenAI's O1~citeo1 and DeepSeek-R1~citer1. However, widely used algorithms such as PPO~citeppo and GRPO~citegrpo rely on likelihood-ratio correction and heuristic clipping, which increase algorithmic complexity and may introduce additional variance and optimization bias. We present EM Policy Gradient (EMPG), a simple and principled framework that formulates reinforcement learning over reasoning trajectories as an Expectation-Maximization (EM) problem~citeem, dempster1977em. The E-step constructs a reward-weighted distribution over rationale trajectories, while the M-step improves the language model by maximizing their weighted log-likelihood. This formulation leads to a practical off-policy policy-gradient algorithm that directly optimizes the EM surrogate objective without trajectory-level importance weighting or likelihood-ratio clipping. Moreover, under exact E- and improving M-steps, EMPG guarantees monotonic improvement of the expected-reward objective. Experiments on GSM8K and MATH Hard with multiple Qwen2.5 base models show that EMPG achieves performance comparable to or better than GRPO while using a substantially simpler optimization procedure. EMPG also produces more concise reasoning trajectories and exhibits structured reasoning behaviors, including subproblem decomposition, self-verification, reflection, and backtracking. These results suggest that the EM perspective provides an effective theoretical and algorithmic foundation for reinforcement learning of reasoning language models.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2025.
Builds on
14 of 20 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs22 Jan
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul
Other references · 12
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
- 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoningcited by 940
- 2025When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMscited by 183
- 2025Qwen2.5-1M Technical Reportcited by 164
- 2025T1: Advancing Language Model Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning and Inference Scalingcited by 77
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026EMA Policy Gradient: Taming Reinforcement Learning for LLMs with EMA Anchor and Top-k KL
- 2026Beyond the Mean: Multi-Moment Policy Optimization for LLM Reasoning
- 2025Accelerating RL for LLM Reasoning with Optimal Advantage Regression
- 2025Future Policy Approximation for Offline Reinforcement Learning in LLM Reasoning
- 2025Slow-Fast Policy Optimization: Reposition-Before-Update for LLM Reasoning
- 2025RiskPO: Risk-based Policy Optimization via Verifiable Reward for LLM Post-Training
- 2025Trajectory Bellman Residual Minimization: A Simple Value-Based Method for LLM Reasoning
- 2026R2PO: Decoupling Rollout and Inference Policies for LLM Reasoning