mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The effects of Hessian eigenvalue spectral density type on the applicability of Hessian analysis to generalization capability assessment of neural networks

arXiv 2504.17618 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2025cs.LG cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hessians of neural network (NN) contain essential information about the curvature of NN loss landscapes which can be used to estimate NN generalization capabilities. We have previously proposed generalization criteria that rely on the observation that Hessian eigenvalue spectral density (HESD) behaves similarly for a wide class of NNs. This paper further studies their applicability by investigating factors that can result in different types of HESD. We conduct a wide range of experiments showing that HESD mainly has positive eigenvalues (MP-HESD) for NN training and fine-tuning with various optimizers on different datasets with different preprocessing and augmentation procedures. We also show that mainly negative HESD (MN-HESD) is a consequence of external gradient manipulation, indicating that the previously proposed Hessian analysis methodology cannot be applied in such cases. We also propose criteria and corresponding conditions to determine HESD type and estimate NN generalization potential. These HESD types and previously proposed generalization criteria are combined into a unified HESD analysis methodology. Finally, we discuss how HESD changes during training, and show the occurrence of quasi-singular (QS) HESD and its influence on the proposed methodology and on the conventional assumptions about the relation between Hessian eigenvalues and NN loss landscape curvature.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2025.

Builds on

15 of 20 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  5. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  6. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,130
  7. 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,033
  8. 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 569
  9. 2019PyHessian: Neural Networks Through the Lens of the Hessiancited by 292
  10. 2020ADAHESSIAN: An Adaptive Second Order Optimizer for Machine Learningcited by 202
  11. 2024Why Transformers Need Adam: A Hessian Perspectivecited by 124
  12. 2019Emergent properties of the local geometry of neural loss landscapescited by 46
3 more
  1. 2016An empirical analysis of the optimization of deep network loss surfacescited by 21
  2. 2022Visualizing high-dimensional loss landscapes with Hessian directionscited by 16
  3. 2024Investigating generalization capabilities of neural networks by means of loss landscapes and Hessian analysiscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.