mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hybrid Reinforcement Learning and Model Predictive Control for Adaptive Control of Hydrogen-Diesel Dual-Fuel Combustion

arXiv 2504.16875 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2025cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for autonomous driving and traffic

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning (RL) and Machine Learning Integrated Model Predictive Control (ML-MPC) are promising approaches for optimizing hydrogen-diesel dual-fuel engine control, as they can effectively control multiple-input multiple-output systems and nonlinear processes. ML-MPC is advantageous for providing safe and optimal controls, ensuring the engine operates within predefined safety limits. In contrast, RL is distinguished by its adaptability to changing conditions through its learning-based approach. However, the practical implementation of either method alone poses challenges. RL requires high variance in control inputs during early learning phases, which can pose risks to the system by potentially executing unsafe actions, leading to mechanical damage. Conversely, ML-MPC relies on an accurate system model to generate optimal control inputs and has limited adaptability to system drifts, such as injector aging, which naturally occur in engine applications. To address these limitations, this study proposes a hybrid RL and ML-MPC approach that uses an ML-MPC framework while incorporating an RL agent to dynamically adjust the ML-MPC load tracking reference in response to changes in the environment. At the same time, the ML-MPC ensures that actions stay safe throughout the RL agent's exploration. To evaluate the effectiveness of this approach, fuel pressure is deliberately varied to introduce a model-plant mismatch between the ML-MPC and the engine test bench. The result of this mismatch is a root mean square error (RMSE) in indicated mean effective pressure of 0.57 bar when running the ML-MPC. The experimental results demonstrate that RL successfully adapts to changing boundary conditions by altering the tracking reference while ML-MPC ensures safe control inputs. The quantitative improvement in load tracking by implementing RL is an RSME of 0.44 bar.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for autonomous driving and traffic, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 8 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2025.

Builds on

8 of 14 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Safe Reinforcement Learning for Real-World Engine Control28 Jan

Other references · 7

  1. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
  2. 2019acados: a modular open-source framework for fast embedded optimal controlcited by 68
  3. 2023Introducing a Deep Neural Network-based Model Predictive Control Framework for Rapid Controller Implementationcited by 3
  4. 2023LExCI: A Framework for Reinforcement Learning with Embedded Systemscited by 3
  5. 2022Deep Learning based Model Predictive Control for Compression Ignition Enginescited by 2
  6. 2025Safe Reinforcement Learning-based Control for Hydrogen Diesel Dual-Fuel Enginescited by 2
  7. 2025Rollout Then Optimize: A One-Step Newton Refinement of Learned Policies for Nonlinear Model Predictive Controlcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Systematic Review and Taxonomy of Reinforcement Learning-Model Predictive Control Integration for Linear Systems
  2. 2025Synthesis of Model Predictive Control and Reinforcement Learning: Survey and Classification
  3. 2025Computationally efficient Gauss-Newton reinforcement learning for model predictive control
  4. 2025Intersection of Reinforcement Learning and Bayesian Optimization for Intelligent Control of Industrial Processes: A Safe MPC-based DPG using Multi-Objective BO
  5. 2026Bridging RL and MPC for mixed-integer optimal control with application to Formula 1 race strategies
  6. 2025Model-Free Predictive Control: Introductory Algebraic Calculations, and a Comparison with HEOL and ANNs
  7. 2026Reinforcement Learning with Distributed MPC for Fuel-Efficient Platoon Control with Discrete Gear Transitions
  8. 2025From Shadow to Light: Toward Safe and Efficient Policy Learning Across MPC, DeePC, RL, and LLM Agents