OPUS-VFL: Incentivizing Optimal Privacy-Utility Tradeoffs in Vertical Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vertical Federated Learning (VFL) enables organizations with disjoint feature spaces but shared user bases to collaboratively train models without sharing raw data. However, existing VFL systems face critical limitations: they often lack effective incentive mechanisms, struggle to balance privacy-utility tradeoffs, and fail to accommodate clients with heterogeneous resource capabilities. These challenges hinder meaningful participation, degrade model performance, and limit practical deployment. To address these issues, we propose OPUS-VFL, an Optimal Privacy-Utility tradeoff Strategy for VFL. OPUS-VFL introduces a novel, privacy-aware incentive mechanism that rewards clients based on a principled combination of model contribution, privacy preservation, and resource investment. It employs a lightweight leave-one-out (LOO) strategy to quantify feature importance per client, and integrates an adaptive differential privacy mechanism that enables clients to dynamically calibrate noise levels to optimize their individual utility. Our framework is designed to be scalable, budget-balanced, and robust to inference and poisoning attacks. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets (MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100) demonstrate that OPUS-VFL significantly outperforms state-of-the-art VFL baselines in both efficiency and robustness. It reduces label inference attack success rates by up to 20%, increases feature inference reconstruction error (MSE) by over 30%, and achieves up to 25% higher incentives for clients that contribute meaningfully while respecting privacy and cost constraints. These results highlight the practicality and innovation of OPUS-VFL as a secure, fair, and performance-driven solution for real-world VFL.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2025.
Builds on
12 of 38 references.
References · 12
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2018Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient datacited by 395
- 2020An Incentive Mechanism for Federated Learning in Wireless Cellular network: An Auction Approachcited by 39
- 2021FedV: Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning over Vertically Partitioned Datacited by 31
- 2023FedVS: Straggler-Resilient and Privacy-Preserving Vertical Federated Learning for Split Modelscited by 17
- 2023FedSDG-FS: Efficient and Secure Feature Selection for Vertical Federated Learningcited by 15
- 2022Improving Privacy-Preserving Vertical Federated Learning by Efficient Communication with ADMMcited by 10
- 2023BadVFL: Backdoor Attacks in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 10
- 2021PIVODL: Privacy-preserving vertical federated learning over distributed labelscited by 9
- 2024A Survey on Contribution Evaluation in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 5
- 2023Privet: A Privacy-Preserving Vertical Federated Learning Service for Gradient Boosted Decision Tablescited by 3
- 2023Incentive Allocation in Vertical Federated Learning Based on Bankruptcy Problemcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Secure and Privacy-Preserving Vertical Federated Learning15 Apr 2026