mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RePOPE: Impact of Annotation Errors on the POPE Benchmark

arXiv 2504.15707 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2025cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Since data annotation is costly, benchmark datasets often incorporate labels from established image datasets. In this work, we assess the impact of label errors in MSCOCO on the frequently used object hallucination benchmark POPE. We re-annotate the benchmark images and identify an imbalance in annotation errors across different subsets. Evaluating multiple models on the revised labels, which we denote as RePOPE, we observe notable shifts in model rankings, highlighting the impact of label quality. Code and data are available at https://github.com/YanNeu/RePOPE .

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2025.

Builds on

8 of 10 references.

References · 8

  1. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,719
  2. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,729
  3. 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scalingcited by 1,599
  4. 2024PaliGemma: A versatile 3B VLM for transfercited by 696
  5. 2024VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Modelscited by 455
  6. 2024PaliGemma 2: A Family of Versatile VLMs for Transfercited by 207
  7. 2023Identifying Label Errors in Object Detection Datasets by Loss Inspectioncited by 16
  8. 2025DASH: Detection and Assessment of Systematic Hallucinations of VLMscited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 6.

9 papers.