SCALE-Sim v3: A modular cycle-accurate systolic accelerator simulator for end-to-end system analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid advancements in AI, scientific computing, and high-performance computing (HPC) have driven the need for versatile and efficient hardware accelerators. Existing tools like SCALE-Sim v2 provide valuable cycle-accurate simulations for systolic-array-based architectures but fall short in supporting key modern features such as sparsity, multi-core scalability, and comprehensive memory analysis. To address these limitations, we present SCALE-Sim v3, a modular, cycle-accurate simulator that extends the capabilities of its predecessor. SCALE-Sim v3 introduces five significant enhancements: multi-core simulation with spatio-temporal partitioning and hierarchical memory structures, support for sparse matrix multiplications (SpMM) with layer-wise and row-wise sparsity, integration with Ramulator for detailed DRAM analysis, precise data layout modeling to minimize memory stalls, and energy and power estimation via Accelergy. These improvements enable deeper end-to-end system analysis for modern AI accelerators, accommodating a wide variety of systems and workloads and providing detailed full-system insights into latency, bandwidth, and power efficiency. A 128x128 array is 6.53x faster than a 32x32 array for ViT-base, using only latency as a metric. However, SCALE-Sim v3 finds that 32x32 is 2.86x more energy-efficient due to better utilization and lower leakage energy. For EdP, 64x64 outperforms both 128x128 and 32x32 for ViT-base. SCALE-Sim v2 shows a 21% reduction in compute cycles for six ResNet18 layers using weight-stationary (WS) dataflow compared to output-stationary (OS). However, when factoring in DRAM stalls, OS dataflow exhibits 30.1% lower execution cycles compared to WS, highlighting the critical role of detailed DRAM analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 7.
9 papers.
- 2026FLARE: One-Shot PE-Level Fault Localization in Systolic Arrays via Algebraic Test Vectorscited by 1
- 2025Comprehensive Design Space Exploration for Tensorized Neural Network Hardware Acceleratorscited by 0
- 2025Prefill vs. Decode Bottlenecks: SRAM-Frequency Tradeoffs and the Memory-Bandwidth Ceilingcited by 0
- 2026REASON: Accelerating Probabilistic Logical Reasoning for Scalable Neuro-Symbolic Intelligencecited by 0
- 2026ChatNeuroSim: An LLM Agent Framework for Automated Compute-in-Memory Accelerator Deployment and Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026SISA: A Scale-In Systolic Array for GEMM Accelerationcited by 0
- 2026AgentDSE: Reasoning-Augmented Architectural Design Space Explorationcited by 0
- 2026Heterogeneity-Aware Microscaling for Efficient Low-Bit LLM Inferencecited by 0
- 2026PerfReasoning: How Well Do LLMs Reason on Hardware Performance?cited by 0
- 2026PerfReasoning: How Well Do LLMs Reason on Hardware Performance?3 Sep 2026
- 2026Heterogeneity-Aware Microscaling for Efficient Low-Bit LLM Inference4 Aug 2026
- 2026AgentDSE: Reasoning-Augmented Architectural Design Space Exploration20 Jun 2026
- 2026FLARE: One-Shot PE-Level Fault Localization in Systolic Arrays via Algebraic Test Vectors9 May 2026
- 2026SISA: A Scale-In Systolic Array for GEMM Acceleration31 Mar 2026
- 2026ChatNeuroSim: An LLM Agent Framework for Automated Compute-in-Memory Accelerator Deployment and Optimization4 Mar 2026
- 2026REASON: Accelerating Probabilistic Logical Reasoning for Scalable Neuro-Symbolic Intelligence28 Jan 2026
- 2025Prefill vs. Decode Bottlenecks: SRAM-Frequency Tradeoffs and the Memory-Bandwidth Ceiling26 Dec 2025
- 2025Comprehensive Design Space Exploration for Tensorized Neural Network Hardware Accelerators22 Nov 2025