mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Impact of Latent Space Dimension on IoT Botnet Detection Performance: VAE-Encoder Versus ViT-Encoder

arXiv 2504.14879 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid evolution of Internet of Things (IoT) technology has led to a significant increase in the number of IoT devices, applications, and services. This surge in IoT devices, along with their widespread presence, has made them a prime target for various cyber-attacks, particularly through IoT botnets. As a result, security has become a major concern within the IoT ecosystem. This study focuses on investigating how the latent dimension impacts the performance of different deep learning classifiers when trained on latent vector representations of the train dataset. The primary objective is to compare the outcomes of these models when encoder components from two cutting-edge architectures: the Vision Transformer (ViT) and the Variational Auto-Encoder (VAE) are utilized to project the high dimensional train dataset to the learned low dimensional latent space. The encoder components are employed to project high-dimensional structured .csv IoT botnet traffic datasets to various latent sizes. Evaluated on N-BaIoT and CICIoT2022 datasets, findings reveal that VAE-encoder based dimension reduction outperforms ViT-encoder based dimension reduction for both datasets in terms of four performance metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score for all models which can be attributed to absence of spatial patterns in the datasets the ViT model attempts to learn and extract from image instances.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2025.

Builds on

11 of 30 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
  4. 2019Learning Deep Transformer Models for Machine Translationcited by 309
  5. 2018Learning Deep Models for Face Anti-Spoofing: Binary or Auxiliary Supervisioncited by 167
  6. 2018Towards the Development of Realistic Botnet Dataset in the Internet of Things for Network Forensic Analytics: Bot-IoT Datasetcited by 98
  7. 2018N-BaIoT: Network-based Detection of IoT Botnet Attacks Using Deep Autoencoderscited by 67
  8. 2020Very Deep Transformers for Neural Machine Translationcited by 50
  9. 2020Large Scale Legal Text Classification Using Transformer Modelscited by 18
  10. 2020Machine Learning-Based Early Detection of IoT Botnets Using Network-Edge Trafficcited by 4
  11. 2022NFDLM: A Lightweight Network Flow based Deep Learning Model for DDoS Attack Detection in IoT Domainscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

6 papers.