Self-Correction Makes LLMs Better Parsers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, recent studies suggest that they still face challenges in performing fundamental NLP tasks essential for deep language understanding, particularly syntactic parsing. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth analysis of LLM parsing capabilities, delving into the specific shortcomings of their parsing results. We find that LLMs may stem from limitations to fully leverage grammar rules in existing treebanks, which restricts their capability to generate valid syntactic structures. To help LLMs acquire knowledge without additional training, we propose a self-correction method that leverages grammar rules from existing treebanks to guide LLMs in correcting previous errors. Specifically, we automatically detect potential errors and dynamically search for relevant rules, offering hints and examples to guide LLMs in making corrections themselves. Experimental results on three datasets with various LLMs, demonstrate that our method significantly improves performance in both in-domain and cross-domain settings on the English and Chinese datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2025.
Builds on
15 of 32 references.
References · 15
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
- 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 1,017
- 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 734
- 2018Constituency Parsing with a Self-Attentive Encodercited by 199
- 2022Re3: Generating Longer Stories With Recursive Reprompting and Revisioncited by 193
- 2023LLMs cannot find reasoning errors, but can correct them given the error locationcited by 85
- 2014Grammar as a Foreign Languagecited by 70
- 2024Can LLMs Learn from Previous Mistakes? Investigating LLMs' Errors to Boost for Reasoningcited by 69
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Can Pruning Improve Reasoning? Revisiting Long-CoT Compression with Capability in Mind for Better Reasoningcited by 19
- 2025SAC-Opt: Semantic Anchors for Iterative Correction in Optimization Modelingcited by 8
- 2026Lost in Speech: Benchmarking, Evaluation, and Parsing of Spoken Bilingual Conversational Language Beyond Standard UD Assumptionscited by 0
- 2026Arabic Morphosyntactic Tagging and Dependency Parsing with Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Arabic Morphosyntactic Tagging and Dependency Parsing with Large Language Models17 Mar 2026
- 2026Lost in Speech: Benchmarking, Evaluation, and Parsing of Spoken Bilingual Conversational Language Beyond Standard UD Assumptions6 Feb 2026
- 2025SAC-Opt: Semantic Anchors for Iterative Correction in Optimization Modeling28 Sep 2025
- 2025Can Pruning Improve Reasoning? Revisiting Long-CoT Compression with Capability in Mind for Better Reasoning20 May 2025