mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How Well Do Large Language Models Understand Syntax? An Evaluation by Asking Natural Language Questions

arXiv 2311.08287 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2023cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) bring us closer to achieving artificial general intelligence, the question persists: Do LLMs truly understand language, or do they merely mimic comprehension through pattern recognition? This study seeks to explore this question through the lens of syntax, a crucial component of sentence comprehension. Adopting a natural language question-answering (Q&A) scheme, we craft questions targeting nine syntactic knowledge points that are most closely related to sentence comprehension. Experiments conducted on 24 LLMs suggest that most have a limited grasp of syntactic knowledge, exhibiting notable discrepancies across different syntactic knowledge points. In particular, questions involving prepositional phrase attachment pose the greatest challenge, whereas those concerning adjectival modifier and indirect object are relatively easier for LLMs to handle. Furthermore, a case study on the training dynamics of the LLMs reveals that the majority of syntactic knowledge is learned during the initial stages of training, hinting that simply increasing the number of training tokens may not be the `silver bullet' for improving the comprehension ability of LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2023.

Builds on

12 of 16 references.

References · 12

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  3. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  4. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
  5. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 701
  6. 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 694
  7. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 553
  8. 2023Do Transformers Parse while Predicting the Masked Word?cited by 48
  9. 2021Refining Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 41
  10. 2020A Tale of a Probe and a Parsercited by 40
  11. 2023ChatGPT is a Potential Zero-Shot Dependency Parsercited by 5
  12. 2020On the Branching Bias of Syntax Extracted from Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

7 papers.