How Well Do Large Language Models Understand Syntax? An Evaluation by Asking Natural Language Questions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) bring us closer to achieving artificial general intelligence, the question persists: Do LLMs truly understand language, or do they merely mimic comprehension through pattern recognition? This study seeks to explore this question through the lens of syntax, a crucial component of sentence comprehension. Adopting a natural language question-answering (Q&A) scheme, we craft questions targeting nine syntactic knowledge points that are most closely related to sentence comprehension. Experiments conducted on 24 LLMs suggest that most have a limited grasp of syntactic knowledge, exhibiting notable discrepancies across different syntactic knowledge points. In particular, questions involving prepositional phrase attachment pose the greatest challenge, whereas those concerning adjectival modifier and indirect object are relatively easier for LLMs to handle. Furthermore, a case study on the training dynamics of the LLMs reveals that the majority of syntactic knowledge is learned during the initial stages of training, hinting that simply increasing the number of training tokens may not be the `silver bullet' for improving the comprehension ability of LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2023.
Builds on
12 of 16 references.
References · 12
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
- 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
- 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 701
- 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 694
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 553
- 2023Do Transformers Parse while Predicting the Masked Word?cited by 48
- 2021Refining Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 41
- 2020A Tale of a Probe and a Parsercited by 40
- 2023ChatGPT is a Potential Zero-Shot Dependency Parsercited by 5
- 2020On the Branching Bias of Syntax Extracted from Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2025In-context Learning of Evolving Data Streams with Tabular Foundational Modelscited by 7
- 2025Large Language Model probabilities cannot distinguish between possible and impossible languagecited by 5
- 2025Self-Correction Makes LLMs Better Parserscited by 4
- 2025Community size rather than grammatical complexity better predicts Large Language Model accuracy in a novel Wug Testcited by 2
- 2025BAMBI: Developing Baby Language Models for Italiancited by 1
- 2026The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Tracing the ongoing emergence of human-like reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Tracing the ongoing emergence of human-like reasoning in Large Language Models20 May 2026
- 2026The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Models9 Jan 2026
- 2025Community size rather than grammatical complexity better predicts Large Language Model accuracy in a novel Wug Test14 Oct 2025
- 2025Large Language Model probabilities cannot distinguish between possible and impossible language18 Sep 2025
- 2025Self-Correction Makes LLMs Better Parsers19 Apr 2025
- 2025BAMBI: Developing Baby Language Models for Italian12 Mar 2025
- 2025In-context Learning of Evolving Data Streams with Tabular Foundational Models24 Feb 2025