MEQA: A Meta-Evaluation Framework for Question & Answer LLM Benchmarks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As Large Language Models (LLMs) advance, their potential for widespread societal impact grows simultaneously. Hence, rigorous LLM evaluations are both a technical necessity and social imperative. While numerous evaluation benchmarks have been developed, there remains a critical gap in meta-evaluation: effectively assessing benchmarks' quality. We propose MEQA, a framework for the meta-evaluation of question and answer (QA) benchmarks, to provide standardized assessments, quantifiable scores, and enable meaningful intra-benchmark comparisons. We demonstrate this approach on cybersecurity benchmarks, using human and LLM evaluators, highlighting the benchmarks' strengths and weaknesses. We motivate our choice of test domain by AI models' dual nature as powerful defensive tools and security threats.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2025.
Builds on
20 of 26 references.
References · 20
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 778
- 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 488
- 2019Measurement and Fairnesscited by 299
- 2023State of What Art? A Call for Multi-Prompt LLM Evaluationcited by 299
- 2022PromptSource: An Integrated Development Environment and Repository for Natural Language Promptscited by 288
- 2021All That's 'Human' Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Textcited by 287
- 2024Lessons from the Trenches on Reproducible Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 172
- 2023DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning Taskscited by 100
- 2023Skill-Mix: a Flexible and Expandable Family of Evaluations for AI modelscited by 64
- 2024Safetywashing: Do AI Safety Benchmarks Actually Measure Safety Progress?cited by 56
8 more
- 2024CyberMetric: A Benchmark Dataset based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Knowledgecited by 55
- 2023Evaluating Superhuman Models with Consistency Checkscited by 47
- 2023Evaluating Evaluation Metrics: A Framework for Analyzing NLG Evaluation Metrics using Measurement Theorycited by 41
- 2023SecQA: A Concise Question-Answering Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Models in Computer Securitycited by 37
- 2023It Takes Two to Tango: Navigating Conceptualizations of NLP Tasks and Measurements of Performancecited by 25
- 2024SEvenLLM: Benchmarking, Eliciting, and Enhancing Abilities of Large Language Models in Cyber Threat Intelligencecited by 20
- 2024SECURE: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Cybersecuritycited by 13
- 2023First Tragedy, then Parse: History Repeats Itself in the New Era of Large Language Modelscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.