MicroFlow: Domain-Specific Optical Flow for Ground Deformation Estimation in Seismic Events
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dense ground displacement measurements are crucial for geological studies but are impractical to collect directly. Traditionally, displacement fields are estimated using patch matching on optical satellite images from different acquisition times. While deep learning-based optical flow models are promising, their adoption in ground deformation analysis is hindered by challenges such as the absence of real ground truth, the need for sub-pixel precision, and temporal variations due to geological or anthropogenic changes. In particular, we identify that deep learning models relying on explicit correlation layers struggle at estimating small displacements in real-world conditions. Instead, we propose a model that employs iterative refinements with explicit warping layers and a correlation-independent backbone, enabling sub-pixel precision. Additionally, a non-convex variant of Total Variation regularization preserves fault-line sharpness while maintaining smoothness elsewhere. Our model significantly outperforms widely used geophysics methods on semi-synthetic benchmarks and generalizes well to challenging real-world scenarios captured by both medium- and high-resolution sensors. Project page: https://jbertrand89.github.io/microflow/.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2025.
Builds on
17 of 45 references.
References · 17
- 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,415
- 2015Spatial Transformer Networkscited by 1,429
- 2015FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networkscited by 1,059
- 2015A Large Dataset to Train Convolutional Networks for Disparity, Optical Flow, and Scene Flow Estimationcited by 881
- 2016FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networkscited by 784
- 2016Optical Flow Estimation using a Spatial Pyramid Networkcited by 424
- 2022FlowFormer: A Transformer Architecture for Optical Flowcited by 275
- 2019Iterative Residual Refinement for Joint Optical Flow and Occlusion Estimationcited by 131
- 2023The Surprising Effectiveness of Diffusion Models for Optical Flow and Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 116
- 2023FlowFormer++: Masked Cost Volume Autoencoding for Pretraining Optical Flow Estimationcited by 114
- 2021AutoFlow: Learning a Better Training Set for Optical Flowcited by 102
- 2018Models Matter, So Does Training: An Empirical Study of CNNs for Optical Flow Estimationcited by 94
5 more
- 2023VideoFlow: Exploiting Temporal Cues for Multi-frame Optical Flow Estimationcited by 82
- 2015EpicFlow: Edge-Preserving Interpolation of Correspondences for Optical Flowcited by 80
- 2024MemFlow: Optical Flow Estimation and Prediction with Memorycited by 55
- 2022Disentangling Architecture and Training for Optical Flowcited by 32
- 2016Fully-Trainable Deep Matchingcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.