mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On-Device Watermarking: A Socio-Technical Imperative For Authenticity In The Age of Generative AI

arXiv 2504.13205 ↗First posted 15 Apr 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

As generative AI models produce increasingly realistic output, both academia and industry are focusing on the ability to detect whether an output was generated by an AI model or not. Many of the research efforts and policy discourse are centered around robust watermarking of AI outputs. While plenty of progress has been made, all watermarking and AI detection techniques face severe limitations. In this position paper, we argue that we are adopting the wrong approach, and should instead focus on watermarking via cryptographic signatures trustworthy content rather than AI generated ones. For audio-visual content, in particular, all real content is grounded in the physical world and captured via hardware sensors. This presents a unique opportunity to watermark at the hardware layer, and we lay out a socio-technical framework and draw parallels with HTTPS certification and Blu-Ray verification protocols. While acknowledging implementation challenges, we contend that hardware-based authentication offers a more tractable path forward, particularly from a policy perspective. As generative models approach perceptual indistinguishability, the research community should be wary of being overly optimistic with AI watermarking, and we argue that AI watermarking research efforts are better spent in the text and LLM space, which are ultimately not traceable to a physical sensor.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 9 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2025.

Builds on

9 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Generative Models are Self-Watermarked: Declaring Model Authentication through Re-Generation23 Feb
  2. 2023Watermarks in the Sand: Impossibility of Strong Watermarking for Generative Models7 Nov
  3. 2023Robustness of AI-Image Detectors: Fundamental Limits and Practical Attacks29 Sep
  4. 2023Evading Watermark based Detection of AI-Generated Content5 May
  5. 2023The Stable Signature: Rooting Watermarks in Latent Diffusion Models27 Mar
  6. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?17 Mar

Other references · 3

  1. 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 178
  2. 2020A Systematic Review on Model Watermarking for Neural Networkscited by 52
  3. 2024Certifiably Robust Image Watermarkcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Media Integrity and Authentication: Status, Directions, and Futures
  2. 2025Secure and Robust Watermarking for AI-generated Images: A Comprehensive Survey
  3. 2025Watermarking for AI Content Detection: A Review on Text, Visual, and Audio Modalities
  4. 2026From Forensics to Ecosystems: Rethinking Watermarks for Generative AI Oversight
  5. 2026Who Gets Flagged? The Pluralistic Evaluation Gap in AI Content Watermarking
  6. 2024SoK: Watermarking for AI-Generated Content
  7. 2025RobustSora: De-Watermarked Benchmark for Robust AI-Generated Video Detection
  8. 2024RealSeal: Revolutionizing Media Authentication with Real-Time Realism Scoring