Efficient MAP Estimation of LLM Judgment Performance with Prior Transfer
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
LLM ensembles are widely used for LLM judges. However, how to estimate their accuracy, especially in an efficient way, is unknown. In this paper, we present a principled maximum a posteriori (MAP) framework for an economical and precise estimation of the performance of LLM ensemble judgment. We first propose a mixture of Beta-Binomial distributions to model the judgment distribution, revising from the vanilla Binomial distribution. Next, we introduce a conformal prediction-driven approach that enables adaptive stopping during iterative sampling to balance accuracy with efficiency. Furthermore, we design a prior transfer mechanism that utilizes learned distributions on open-source datasets to improve estimation on a target dataset when only scarce annotations are available. Finally, we present BetaConform, a framework that integrates our distribution assumption, adaptive stopping, and the prior transfer mechanism to deliver a theoretically guaranteed distribution estimation of LLM ensemble judgment with minimum labeled samples. BetaConform is also validated empirically. For instance, with only 10 samples from the TruthfulQA dataset, for a Llama ensembled judge, BetaConform gauges its performance with error margin as small as 3.37%.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2025.
Builds on
36 of 44 references.
References · 36
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,282
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
- 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 1,011
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
- 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
24 more
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 625
- 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 499
- 2024From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgecited by 494
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 415
- 2024InternLM2 Technical Reportcited by 397
- 2024JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judgescited by 318
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Followingcited by 302
- 2024R-Judge: Benchmarking Safety Risk Awareness for LLM Agentscited by 288
- 2024Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judgecited by 204
- 2023Benchmarking Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models as Evaluatorscited by 150
- 2024Language Models with Conformal Factuality Guaranteescited by 131
- 2020Conformal Prediction: a Unified Review of Theory and New Challengescited by 118
- 2024OffsetBias: Leveraging Debiased Data for Tuning Evaluatorscited by 94
- 2024VL-RewardBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Vision-Language Generative Reward Modelscited by 86
- 2025The Alternative Annotator Test for LLM-as-a-Judge: How to Statistically Justify Replacing Human Annotators with LLMscited by 74
- 2023ICE-Score: Instructing Large Language Models to Evaluate Codecited by 52
- 2023A Comprehensive Analysis of the Effectiveness of Large Language Models as Automatic Dialogue Evaluatorscited by 45
- 2024Auto-Arena: Automating LLM Evaluations with Agent Peer Battles and Committee Discussionscited by 42
- 2024KIEval: A Knowledge-grounded Interactive Evaluation Framework for Large Language Modelscited by 36
- 2024CodeJudge-Eval: Can Large Language Models be Good Judges in Code Understanding?cited by 30
- 2024HalluDial: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Automatic Dialogue-Level Hallucination Evaluationcited by 27
- 2024Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models via Debatescited by 19
- 2024"Seeing the Big through the Small": Can LLMs Approximate Human Judgment Distributions on NLI from a Few Explanations?cited by 17
- 2025Labeling Free-text Data using Language Model Ensemblescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025AnyMAC: Cascading Flexible Multi-Agent Collaboration via Next-Agent Predictioncited by 25
- 2025Multi-Agent Debate for LLM Judges with Adaptive Stability Detectioncited by 23
- 2026Knowing When to Stop: Predicting Execution-Consistency Convergence in Text-to-SQLcited by 1
- 2025Separate the Wheat from the Chaff: Winnowing Down Divergent Views in Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 0
- 2026Knowing When to Stop: Predicting Execution-Consistency Convergence in Text-to-SQL4 Jul 2026
- 2025Separate the Wheat from the Chaff: Winnowing Down Divergent Views in Retrieval Augmented Generation1 Nov 2025
- 2025Multi-Agent Debate for LLM Judges with Adaptive Stability Detection14 Oct 2025
- 2025AnyMAC: Cascading Flexible Multi-Agent Collaboration via Next-Agent Prediction21 Jun 2025