mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Time Marching Neural Operator FE Coupling: AI Accelerated Physics Modeling

arXiv 2504.11383 ↗First posted 15 Apr 2025cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Numerical solvers for PDEs often struggle to balance computational cost with accuracy, especially in multiscale and time-dependent systems. Neural operators offer a promising way to accelerate simulations, but their practical deployment is hindered by several challenges: they typically require large volumes of training data generated from high-fidelity solvers, tend to accumulate errors over time in dynamical settings, and often exhibit poor generalization in multiphysics scenarios. This work introduces a novel hybrid framework that integrates physics-informed deep operator network with FEM through domain decomposition and leverages numerical analysis for time marching. Our innovation lies in efficient coupling FE and DeepONet subdomains via a Schwarz method, expecting to solve complex and nonlinear regions by a pretrained DeepONet, while the remainder is handled by conventional FE. To address the challenges of dynamic systems, we embed a time stepping scheme directly into the DeepONet, substantially reducing long-term error propagation. Furthermore, an adaptive subdomain evolution strategy enables the ML-resolved region to expand dynamically, capturing fine-scale features without remeshing. Our framework shows accelerated convergence rates (up to 20% improvement in convergence rates compared to conventional FE coupling approaches) while preserving solution fidelity with error margins consistently below 3%. Our study shows that our proposed hybrid solver: (1) reduces computational costs by eliminating fine mesh requirements, (2) mitigates error accumulation in time-dependent simulations, and (3) enables automatic adaptation to evolving physical phenomena. This work establishes a new paradigm for coupling state of the art physics based and machine learning solvers in a unified framework, offering a robust, reliable, and scalable pathway for high fidelity multiscale simulations.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2025.

Builds on

17 of 62 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  2. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
  3. 2023GNOT: A General Neural Operator Transformer for Operator Learningcited by 336
  4. 2019Transfer learning enhanced physics informed neural network for phase-field modeling of fracturecited by 116
  5. 2022Physics-Informed Deep Neural Operator Networkscited by 113
  6. 2021A physics-informed variational DeepONet for predicting the crack path in brittle materialscited by 98
  7. 2022Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learningcited by 65
  8. 2022Interfacing Finite Elements with Deep Neural Operators for Fast Multiscale Modeling of Mechanics Problemscited by 48
  9. 2023Neural Operator Learning for Long-Time Integration in Dynamical Systems with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 32
  10. 2023On the training and generalization of deep operator networkscited by 31
  11. 2022Partial Differential Equations Meet Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 25
  12. 2023Rethinking materials simulations: Blending direct numerical simulations with neural operatorscited by 25
5 more
  1. 2021Hybrid FEM-NN models: Combining artificial neural networks with the finite element methodcited by 24
  2. 2022Integrated Finite Element Neural Network (I-FENN) for non-local continuum damage mechanicscited by 13
  3. 2023Domain decomposition-based coupling of physics-informed neural networks via the Schwarz alternating methodcited by 9
  4. 2022Koopman operator for time-dependent reliability analysiscited by 7
  5. 2024Causality-Respecting Adaptive Refinement for PINNs: Enabling Precise Interface Evolution in Phase Field Modelingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

8 papers.