A real-time anomaly detection method for robots based on a flexible and sparse latent space
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The growing demand for robots to operate effectively in diverse environments necessitates the need for robust real-time anomaly detection techniques during robotic operations. However, deep learning-based models in robotics face significant challenges due to limited training data and highly noisy signal features. In this paper, we present Sparse Masked Autoregressive Flow-based Adversarial AutoEncoder model to address these problems. This approach integrates Masked Autoregressive Flow model into Adversarial AutoEncoders to construct a flexible latent space and utilize Sparse autoencoder to efficiently focus on important features, even in scenarios with limited feature space. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed model achieves a 4.96% to 9.75% higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for pick-and-place robotic operations with randomly placed cans, compared to existing state-of-the-art methods. Notably, it showed up to 19.67% better performance in scenarios involving collisions with lightweight objects. Additionally, unlike the existing state-of-the-art model, our model performs inferences within 1 millisecond, ensuring real-time anomaly detection. These capabilities make our model highly applicable to machine learning-based robotic safety systems in dynamic environments. The code is available at https://github.com/twkang43/sparse-maf-aae.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2025.
Builds on
15 of 37 references.
References · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
- 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 684
- 2015Adversarial Autoencoderscited by 364
- 2018Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filteringcited by 310
- 2015MADE: Masked Autoencoder for Distribution Estimationcited by 307
- 2020Why Normalizing Flows Fail to Detect Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 221
- 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 215
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026RC-NF: Robot-Conditioned Normalizing Flow for Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Robotic Manipulation
- 2024Real-Time Anomaly Detection and Reactive Planning with Large Language Models
- 2025Multimodal Anomaly Detection with a Mixture-of-Experts
- 2026Continuous Online Fault Detection for Mobile Robots via Adaptive Edge Models
- 2026DRIFT: Derailing Denoising Trajectories of Flow-Matching VLAs with Adversarial Patch Attack
- 2026Conditional Flow Matching for Continuous Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Driving on a Manifold-Aware Spectral Space
- 2024Towards efficient deep autoencoders for multivariate time series anomaly detection
- 2021Trust Your Robots! Predictive Uncertainty Estimation of Neural Networks with Sparse Gaussian Processes