Explainability and Continual Learning meet Federated Learning at the Network Edge
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As edge devices become more capable and pervasive in wireless networks, there is growing interest in leveraging their collective compute power for distributed learning. However, optimizing learning at the network edge entails unique challenges, particularly when moving beyond conventional settings and objectives. While Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a key paradigm for distributed model training, critical challenges persist. First, existing approaches often overlook the trade-off between predictive accuracy and interpretability. Second, they struggle to integrate inherently explainable models such as decision trees because their non-differentiable structure makes them not amenable to backpropagation-based training algorithms. Lastly, they lack meaningful mechanisms for continual Machine Learning (ML) model adaptation through Continual Learning (CL) in resource-limited environments. In this paper, we pave the way for a set of novel optimization problems that emerge in distributed learning at the network edge with wirelessly interconnected edge devices, and we identify key challenges and future directions. Specifically, we discuss how Multi-objective optimization (MOO) can be used to address the trade-off between predictive accuracy and explainability when using complex predictive models. Next, we discuss the implications of integrating inherently explainable tree-based models into distributed learning settings. Finally, we investigate how CL strategies can be effectively combined with FL to support adaptive, lifelong learning when limited-size buffers are used to store past data for retraining. Our approach offers a cohesive set of tools for designing privacy-preserving, adaptive, and trustworthy ML solutions tailored to the demands of edge computing and intelligent services.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2025.
Builds on
17 of 27 references.
References · 17
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
- 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 821
- 2017Lifelong Learning with Dynamically Expandable Networkscited by 694
- 2019A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protectioncited by 374
- 2018Task-Free Continual Learningcited by 221
- 2020Federated Continual Learning with Weighted Inter-client Transfercited by 161
- 2019Scalable and Order-robust Continual Learning with Additive Parameter Decompositioncited by 125
- 2022Beyond Not-Forgetting: Continual Learning with Backward Knowledge Transfercited by 59
- 2020IBM Federated Learning: an Enterprise Framework White Paper V0.1cited by 57
- 2019Practical Federated Gradient Boosting Decision Treescited by 54
5 more
- 2019Regularizing Black-box Models for Improved Interpretabilitycited by 35
- 2023Federated Multi-Objective Learningcited by 12
- 2016A Survey of Multi-Objective Optimization in Wireless Sensor Networks: Metrics, Algorithms and Open Problemscited by 9
- 2024An Interpretable Client Decision Tree Aggregation process for Federated Learningcited by 5
- 2025Joint Explainability-Performance Optimization With Surrogate Models for AI-Driven Edge Servicescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.