mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An Interpretable Client Decision Tree Aggregation process for Federated Learning

arXiv 2404.02510 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence solutions are essential in today's data-driven applications, prioritizing principles such as robustness, safety, transparency, explainability, and privacy among others. This has led to the emergence of Federated Learning as a solution for privacy and distributed machine learning. While decision trees, as self-explanatory models, are ideal for collaborative model training across multiple devices in resource-constrained environments such as federated learning environments for injecting interpretability in these models. Decision tree structure makes the aggregation in a federated learning environment not trivial. They require techniques that can merge their decision paths without introducing bias or overfitting while keeping the aggregated decision trees robust and generalizable. In this paper, we propose an Interpretable Client Decision Tree Aggregation process for Federated Learning scenarios that keeps the interpretability and the precision of the base decision trees used for the aggregation. This model is based on aggregating multiple decision paths of the decision trees and can be used on different decision tree types, such as ID3 and CART. We carry out the experiments within four datasets, and the analysis shows that the tree built with the model improves the local models, and outperforms the state-of-the-art.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2024.

Builds on

11 of 33 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  3. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
  4. 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 210
  5. 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 207
  6. 2019SecureBoost: A Lossless Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 176
  7. 2023Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulationcited by 61
  8. 2019Practical Federated Gradient Boosting Decision Treescited by 54
  9. 2019Federated Forestcited by 49
  10. 2020Federated Learning and Differential Privacy: Software tools analysis, the Sherpa.ai FL framework and methodological guidelines for preserving data privacycited by 22
  11. 2022OpBoost: A Vertical Federated Tree Boosting Framework Based on Order-Preserving Desensitizationcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

5 papers.