An Interpretable Client Decision Tree Aggregation process for Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence solutions are essential in today's data-driven applications, prioritizing principles such as robustness, safety, transparency, explainability, and privacy among others. This has led to the emergence of Federated Learning as a solution for privacy and distributed machine learning. While decision trees, as self-explanatory models, are ideal for collaborative model training across multiple devices in resource-constrained environments such as federated learning environments for injecting interpretability in these models. Decision tree structure makes the aggregation in a federated learning environment not trivial. They require techniques that can merge their decision paths without introducing bias or overfitting while keeping the aggregated decision trees robust and generalizable. In this paper, we propose an Interpretable Client Decision Tree Aggregation process for Federated Learning scenarios that keeps the interpretability and the precision of the base decision trees used for the aggregation. This model is based on aggregating multiple decision paths of the decision trees and can be used on different decision tree types, such as ID3 and CART. We carry out the experiments within four datasets, and the analysis shows that the tree built with the model improves the local models, and outperforms the state-of-the-art.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2024.
Builds on
11 of 33 references.
References · 11
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
- 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 210
- 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 207
- 2019SecureBoost: A Lossless Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 176
- 2023Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulationcited by 61
- 2019Practical Federated Gradient Boosting Decision Treescited by 54
- 2019Federated Forestcited by 49
- 2020Federated Learning and Differential Privacy: Software tools analysis, the Sherpa.ai FL framework and methodological guidelines for preserving data privacycited by 22
- 2022OpBoost: A Vertical Federated Tree Boosting Framework Based on Order-Preserving Desensitizationcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024From Challenges and Pitfalls to Recommendations and Opportunities: Implementing Federated Learning in Healthcarecited by 16
- 2025Explainability and Continual Learning meet Federated Learning at the Network Edgecited by 0
- 2025From Privacy to Trust in the Agentic Era: A Taxonomy of Challenges in Trustworthy Federated Learning Through the Lens of Trust Report 2.0cited by 0
- 2026Federated Rule Ensemble Method in Medical Datacited by 0
- 2026CLAD: A Clustered Label-Agnostic Federated Learning Framework for Joint Anomaly Detection and Attack Classificationcited by 0
- 2026CLAD: A Clustered Label-Agnostic Federated Learning Framework for Joint Anomaly Detection and Attack Classification7 May 2026
- 2026Federated Rule Ensemble Method in Medical Data20 Apr 2026
- 2025From Privacy to Trust in the Agentic Era: A Taxonomy of Challenges in Trustworthy Federated Learning Through the Lens of Trust Report 2.021 Jul 2025
- 2025Explainability and Continual Learning meet Federated Learning at the Network Edge11 Apr 2025
- 2024From Challenges and Pitfalls to Recommendations and Opportunities: Implementing Federated Learning in Healthcare15 Sep 2024