Influential Bandits: Pulling an Arm May Change the Environment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While classical formulations of multi-armed bandit problems assume that each arm's reward is independent and stationary, real-world applications often involve non-stationary environments and interdependencies between arms. In particular, selecting one arm may influence the future rewards of other arms, a scenario not adequately captured by existing models such as rotting bandits or restless bandits. To address this limitation, we propose the influential bandit problem, which models inter-arm interactions through an unknown, symmetric, positive semi-definite interaction matrix that governs the dynamics of arm losses. We formally define this problem and establish two regret lower bounds, including a superlinear Omega(T2 / log2 T) bound for the standard LCB algorithm (loss minimization version of UCB) and an algorithm-independent Omega(T) bound, which highlight the inherent difficulty of the setting. We then introduce a new algorithm based on a lower confidence bound (LCB) estimator tailored to the structure of the loss dynamics. Under mild assumptions, our algorithm achieves a regret of O(KT log T), which is nearly optimal in terms of its dependence on the time horizon. The algorithm is simple to implement and computationally efficient. Empirical evaluations on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the presence of inter-arm influence and confirm the superior performance of our method compared to conventional bandit algorithms.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2025.
Builds on
11 of 26 references.
References · 11
- 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 503
- 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 487
- 2019Model-free Reinforcement Learning in Infinite-horizon Average-reward Markov Decision Processescited by 82
- 2017Rotting Banditscited by 57
- 2020Learning Infinite-horizon Average-reward MDPs with Linear Function Approximationcited by 48
- 2022Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 30
- 2019Blocking Banditscited by 25
- 2022Introduction to Online Controlcited by 19
- 2020Non-Stochastic Control with Bandit Feedbackcited by 17
- 2020Contextual Blocking Banditscited by 11
- 2023The Frank-Wolfe algorithm: a short introductioncited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.