mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Embedded Federated Feature Selection with Dynamic Sparse Training: Balancing Accuracy-Cost Tradeoffs

arXiv 2504.05245 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL) enables multiple resource-constrained edge devices with varying levels of heterogeneity to collaboratively train a global model. However, devices with limited capacity can create bottlenecks and slow down model convergence. One effective approach to addressing this issue is to use an efficient feature selection method, which reduces overall resource demands by minimizing communication and computation costs, thereby mitigating the impact of struggling nodes. Existing federated feature selection (FFS) methods are either considered as a separate step from FL or rely on a third party. These approaches increase computation and communication overhead, making them impractical for real-world high-dimensional datasets. To address this, we present textitDynamic Sparse Federated Feature Selection (DSFFS), the first innovative embedded FFS that is efficient in both communication and computation. In the proposed method, feature selection occurs simultaneously with model training. During training, input-layer neurons, their connections, and hidden-layer connections are dynamically pruned and regrown, eliminating uninformative features. This process enhances computational efficiency on devices, improves network communication efficiency, and boosts global model performance. Several experiments are conducted on nine real-world datasets of varying dimensionality from diverse domains, including biology, image, speech, and text. The results under a realistic non-iid data distribution setting show that our approach achieves a better trade-off between accuracy, computation, and communication costs by selecting more informative features compared to other state-of-the-art FFS methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2025.

Builds on

17 of 25 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  2. 2019Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winnerscited by 495
  3. 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data: A Surveycited by 346
  4. 2017Scalable Training of Artificial Neural Networks with Adaptive Sparse Connectivity inspired by Network Sciencecited by 328
  5. 2019Model Pruning Enables Efficient Federated Learning on Edge Devicescited by 222
  6. 2020Cost-Effective Federated Learning Designcited by 62
  7. 2021Federated Dynamic Sparse Training: Computing Less, Communicating Less, Yet Learning Bettercited by 55
  8. 2021Dynamic Sparse Training for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 49
  9. 2021Deep Ensembling with No Overhead for either Training or Testing: The All-Round Blessings of Dynamic Sparsitycited by 44
  10. 2020Quick and Robust Feature Selection: the Strength of Energy-efficient Sparse Training for Autoencoderscited by 28
  11. 2023A Performance-Driven Benchmark for Feature Selection in Tabular Deep Learningcited by 24
  12. 2022Where to Pay Attention in Sparse Training for Feature Selection?cited by 15
5 more
  1. 2023FedSDG-FS: Efficient and Secure Feature Selection for Vertical Federated Learningcited by 15
  2. 2023LESS-VFL: Communication-Efficient Feature Selection for Vertical Federated Learningcited by 14
  3. 2021Federated Feature Selection for Cyber-Physical Systems of Systemscited by 11
  4. 2023Supervised Feature Selection with Neuron Evolution in Sparse Neural Networkscited by 7
  5. 2023Multimodal Multiple Federated Feature Construction Method for IoT Environmentscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.