mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Balancing Robustness and Efficiency in Embedded DNNs Through Activation Function Selection

arXiv 2504.05119 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.ARcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning-based embedded systems for safety-critical applications, such as aerospace and autonomous driving, must be robust to perturbations caused by soft errors. As transistor geometries shrink and voltages decrease, modern electronic devices become more susceptible to background radiation, increasing the concern about failures produced by soft errors. The resilience of deep neural networks (DNNs) to these errors depends not only on target device technology but also on model structure and the numerical representation and arithmetic precision of their parameters. Compression techniques like pruning and quantization, used to reduce memory footprint and computational complexity, alter both model structure and representation, affecting soft error robustness. In this regard, although often overlooked, the choice of activation functions (AFs) impacts not only accuracy and trainability but also compressibility and error resilience. This paper explores the use of bounded AFs to enhance robustness against parameter perturbations, while evaluating their effects on model accuracy, compressibility, and computational load with a technology-agnostic approach. We focus on encoder-decoder convolutional models developed for semantic segmentation of hyperspectral images with application to autonomous driving systems. Experiments are conducted on an AMD-Xilinx's KV260 SoM.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2025.

Builds on

15 of 27 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  4. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  5. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  6. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  7. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  8. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 2,026
  9. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,345
  10. 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMscited by 1,210
  11. 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Modelcited by 461
  12. 2018Self-Imitation Learningcited by 138
3 more
  1. 2025What's Behind PPO's Collapse in Long-CoT? Value Optimization Holds the Secretcited by 98
  2. 2024ReaL: Efficient RLHF Training of Large Language Models with Parameter Reallocationcited by 37
  3. 2025Exploring Data Scaling Trends and Effects in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 26

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Designing DNNs for a trade-off between robustness and processing performance in embedded devices
  2. 2024Evaluating Single Event Upsets in Deep Neural Networks for Semantic Segmentation: an embedded system perspective
  3. 2026From Bit-Position Sensitivity to Unequal Error Protection for DNN Inference Memory
  4. 2026The Weight of a Bit: EMFI Sensitivity Analysis of Embedded Deep Learning Models
  5. 2025Evaluating the Impact of Compression Techniques on the Robustness of CNNs under Natural Corruptions
  6. 2023On the fly Deep Neural Network Optimization Control for Low-Power Computer Vision
  7. 2024Memory Faults in Activation-sparse Quantized Deep Neural Networks: Analysis and Mitigation using Sharpness-aware Training
  8. 2026Mechanistically Interpreting Compression in Vision-Language Models