mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Weight of a Bit: EMFI Sensitivity Analysis of Embedded Deep Learning Models

arXiv 2602.16309 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fault injection attacks on embedded neural network models have been shown as a potent threat. Numerous works studied resilience of models from various points of view. As of now, there is no comprehensive study that would evaluate the influence of number representations used for model parameters against electromagnetic fault injection (EMFI) attacks. In this paper, we investigate how four different number representations influence the success of an EMFI attack on embedded neural network models. We chose two common floating-point representations (32-bit, and 16-bit), and two integer representations (8-bit, and 4-bit). We deployed four common image classifiers, ResNet-18, ResNet-34, ResNet-50, and VGG-11, on an embedded memory chip, and utilized a low-cost EMFI platform to trigger faults. Beyond accuracy evaluation, we characterize the injected fault pattern by analyzing the bit error rate, the spatial distribution of corrupted bytes, and the prevalence of 0xFE/0xFF byte values across formats, identifying the mechanisms responsible for the observed differences in resilience. Our results show that while floating-point representations exhibit almost a complete degradation in accuracy (Top-1 and Top-5) after a single fault injection, integer representations offer better resistance overall. In particular, the 8-bit representation on a relatively large network (VGG-11) retains Top-1 accuracy of around 70% and Top-5 at around 90%.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2026.

Builds on

17 of 40 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2021A White Paper on Neural Network Quantizationcited by 453
  4. 2021Pruning and Quantization for Deep Neural Network Acceleration: A Surveycited by 259
  5. 2020TensorFlow Lite Micro: Embedded Machine Learning on TinyML Systemscited by 161
  6. 2019TBT: Targeted Neural Network Attack with Bit Trojancited by 112
  7. 2019Bit-Flip Attack: Crushing Neural Network with Progressive Bit Searchcited by 106
  8. 2019Terminal Brain Damage: Exposing the Graceless Degradation in Deep Neural Networks Under Hardware Fault Attackscited by 55
  9. 2024Tiny Machine Learning: Progress and Futurescited by 40
  10. 2020SNIFF: Reverse Engineering of Neural Networks with Fault Attackscited by 22
  11. 2021RADAR: Run-time Adversarial Weight Attack Detection and Accuracy Recoverycited by 18
  12. 2016Understanding the Impact of Precision Quantization on the Accuracy and Energy of Neural Networkscited by 17
5 more
  1. 2020DeepDyve: Dynamic Verification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 12
  2. 2021HASHTAG: Hash Signatures for Online Detection of Fault-Injection Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 9
  3. 2021FooBaR: Fault Fooling Backdoor Attack on Neural Network Trainingcited by 6
  4. 2023Fault Injection on Embedded Neural Networks: Impact of a Single Instruction Skipcited by 2
  5. 2024DeepBaR: Fault Backdoor Attack on Deep Neural Network Layerscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.