MIAT: Maneuver-Intention-Aware Transformer for Spatio-Temporal Trajectory Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate vehicle trajectory prediction is critical for safe and efficient autonomous driving, especially in mixed traffic environments when both human-driven and autonomous vehicles co-exist. However, uncertainties introduced by inherent driving behaviors -- such as acceleration, deceleration, and left and right maneuvers -- pose significant challenges for reliable trajectory prediction. We introduce a Maneuver-Intention-Aware Transformer (MIAT) architecture, which integrates a maneuver intention awareness control mechanism with spatiotemporal interaction modeling to enhance long-horizon trajectory predictions. We systematically investigate the impact of varying awareness of maneuver intention on both short- and long-horizon trajectory predictions. Evaluated on the real-world NGSIM dataset and benchmarked against various transformer- and LSTM-based methods, our approach achieves an improvement of up to 4.7% in short-horizon predictions and a 1.6% in long-horizon predictions compared to other intention-aware benchmark methods. Moreover, by leveraging intention awareness control mechanism, MIAT realizes an 11.1% performance boost in long-horizon predictions, with a modest drop in short-horizon performance. The source code and datasets are available at https://github.com/cpraskoti/MIAT.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2025.
Builds on
46 of 64 references.
References · 46
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,061
- 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 763
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
- 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
- 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 613
- 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMscited by 533
34 more
- 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 509
- 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearningcited by 504
- 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 483
- 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 437
- 2023Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Modelscited by 387
- 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMscited by 381
- 2022Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 314
- 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 310
- 2023Large Language Model Unlearningcited by 302
- 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extractioncited by 270
- 2024MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Modelscited by 261
- 2023Membership Inference Attacks against Language Models via Neighbourhood Comparisoncited by 258
- 2023Camels in a Changing Climate: Enhancing LM Adaptation with Tulu 2cited by 229
- 2024Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearningcited by 172
- 2023Can Sensitive Information Be Deleted From LLMs? Objectives for Defending Against Extraction Attackscited by 158
- 2024Infini-gram: Scaling Unbounded n-gram Language Models to a Trillion Tokenscited by 153
- 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.2, Knowledge Manipulationcited by 143
- 2024What makes unlearning hard and what to do about itcited by 89
- 2024Catastrophic Failure of LLM Unlearning via Quantizationcited by 81
- 2024RWKU: Benchmarking Real-World Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Modelscited by 78
- 2024No "Zero-Shot" Without Exponential Data: Pretraining Concept Frequency Determines Multimodal Model Performancecited by 75
- 2024Do Unlearning Methods Remove Information from Language Model Weights?cited by 73
- 2024The Neglected Tails in Vision-Language Modelscited by 63
- 2024Demystifying Verbatim Memorization in Large Language Modelscited by 56
- 2024A Closer Look at Machine Unlearning for Large Language Modelscited by 56
- 2024Auxiliary task demands mask the capabilities of smaller language modelscited by 54
- 2024Preference Learning Algorithms Do Not Learn Preference Rankingscited by 48
- 2023Prompting is not a substitute for probability measurements in large language modelscited by 44
- 2024To Each (Textual Sequence) Its Own: Improving Memorized-Data Unlearning in Large Language Modelscited by 43
- 2023Knowledge Sanitization of Large Language Modelscited by 37
- 2024Mechanistic Unlearning: Robust Knowledge Unlearning and Editing via Mechanistic Localizationcited by 35
- 2024Fundamental Problems With Model Editing: How Should Rational Belief Revision Work in LLMs?cited by 24
- 2024How Many Images Does It Take? Estimating Imitation Thresholds in Text-to-Image Modelscited by 4
- 2024Unlearning in- vs. out-of-distribution data in LLMs under gradient-based methodcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.